17

Who are the descendants of Rav Pappah mentioned in the text of the Siyum for a tractate of Talmud, and why are they so important that we mention them all by name? Why don't we mention any other great rabbis from that era?

2
  • A post on this subject: rabbizalesch.wordpress.com/2017/05/04/…. In short, these were clearly not sons of a single Rav Papa, as they lived in different generations (and different countries). See the post for more information.
    – Leib
    May 4, 2017 at 15:05
  • I don't have it with me now but there is a long explanation of it after the hadran in oz vehadar gemaras. I think that is the teshuvas ramo May 4, 2017 at 17:32

2 Answers 2

12

Not all the "Bar Papa"s mentioned in the list are the sons of the Rav Papa from the Bavli.

The Sefer HaEshkol, written by Rav Avraham Av Beit Din (father-in-law of the Raavad) brings a statement of Rav Hai Gaon (and a proof) that the ten Bar Papas are not all sons of the Rav Papa the student of Rava: HaEshkol Hilchot Sefer Torah 14.

They did not all live at the same time and place, Rav Hai mentions.

He further says that the reason for listing the ten of them at the siyyum is that there is a tradition that saying them prevents forgetfulness. Therefore, when one reads a chapter and reviews it, he says that he will review it, and also says the mnemonic for, and the names of, the ten Bar Papas.

Nowadays, I've never heard of anyone saying the mnemonic.

Rav Tzvi Binyamin Auerbach, who wrote the "Nachal Eshkol" commentary on the Eshkol, comments:

ועתשו' רמ"א בסופה ויש"ש סוף ב"ק

for many further reasons for listing the ten sons of Rav Papa(s).

I'm not certain what the "teshuvat Rama" is here, but second reference is to the Yam Shel Shlomo, but it delves into esoteric concepts, and I am out of my depth.

4
  • Rama: hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=19551&pgnum=144
    – msh210
    Nov 21, 2011 at 15:50
  • 2
    The Yam Shel Shlomo's explanation actually isn't that complicated. He shows how "Papa" represents Moshe (who spoke to Hashem פנים אל פנים - the acronym of which is פפא), and the names of each of the sons symbolize the Ten Commandments.
    – Alex
    Nov 21, 2011 at 15:50
  • @Alex, he continues with how the sons also symbolize the ten ma'amarot that the world was created with.
    – JXG
    Nov 22, 2011 at 7:52
  • @msh210, thanks! It seems that the comment of the Rama is identical to what the Yam Shel Shlomo brings in his name.
    – JXG
    Nov 22, 2011 at 7:53
7

One explanation (from Artscroll Hadran)

Rav Pappa was a very wealthy man who would make great celebrations each time he finished a Mesechta, and invited his 10 sons as well as many others. He therefore brought glory to Torah, which was "reflected in the scholarly attainments of his sons." So we honor Rav Pappa and his family by mentioning them at every siyum.

Another explanation (from here)

There are 10 places in shas where there is a machlokes, and Rav Pappa made peace by accepting both of the opinions. Since Rav Papa did this, he was a vehicle in bringing shelaymos (completion) of the Torah into the world. He therefore merited 10 children, and we mention them at the end of a mesechta because a siyum is a time of completion.

A third explanation (also Artscroll Hadran):

Rav Pappa symbolizes Moshe, and the names of his 10 sons symbolize the Ten Commandments.

5
  • none of them sound like such strong reasons. when did this practice start?
    – Ariel K
    Nov 21, 2011 at 4:45
  • second opinion seems like a strong reason though, although I would expect reish Lakish to be listed there as well in that case.
    – avi
    Nov 21, 2011 at 18:55
  • Does the Artscroll have any citations? (If it does, I'll go look it up.)
    – Shmuel
    Nov 21, 2011 at 23:59
  • Do any Mefarshim discuss the idea that Rav Papa was unique and special in that he successfully fulfilled the mitzvah of chinuch to all of his children, or something along those lines?
    – AEML
    Apr 10, 2013 at 2:33
  • @Efraim Don't remember offhand, but it does sound a bit familiar, for some strange reason. I think it would be a good idea to ask this question on the site (you can phrase it along the lines of "I once heard of such and such reason; does anyone know the source?"
    – yydl
    Apr 10, 2013 at 3:27

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .