Why don't cities take down the Eruv during the flu season, so that no one gets sick?
By taking down the Eruv, one may not carry a cold on Shabbos, which helps stop the spread of disease.
Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this communityWhy don't cities take down the Eruv during the flu season, so that no one gets sick?
By taking down the Eruv, one may not carry a cold on Shabbos, which helps stop the spread of disease.
It is not true one can not carry on Shabbos. What is true is that one may not carry on shabbos. Thus, if we remove the Eruv, we are afraid people will carry inadvertently. Thus, not only will it not help the situation, but more chillul shabbos will be caused.
Because when you first get the flu it takes a few days for symptoms to appear, so people will be transgressing inadvertently by carrying the flu if they have it but don't know it yet.
Even without an eruv, carrying a cold (or anything) is only a rabbinic prohibition, since constructing an eruv relies on the opinion that we don't have a real reshus harabim.
Going near people when you have a cold violates various Biblical prohibitions of causing damage to them. We assume that anyone who knowingly violates that won't worry about rabbinic prohibitions either, so removing the eruv won't accomplish anything.
That only works in the movies.