We all know the importance of backups. Many Temple tools were [seemingly] crucial for everyday tasks: Menorah, Table, Gold Altar, Ash of the Red Heifer, etc.

It would take (probably) days to replace it and therefore would lead to canceling or endangering the availability of important Mitzvos (please add examples).

Did [some of ] the tools of the Temple have backups ready?

  • Actually, a better question would be: Since it's obvious they had backups (like any sensible project, and as documented clearly in a Mishna) from what were they made in the desert, since every penny was accounted for - and that only included the bare minimum. – Danny Schoemann Jul 16 '19 at 14:40

Mishnah Chagigah 3:8:

כָּל הַכֵּלִים שֶׁהָיוּ בַמִּקְדָּשׁ, יֵשׁ לָהֶם שְׁנִיִּים וּשְׁלִישִׁים, שֶׁאִם נִטְמְאוּ הָרִאשׁוֹנִים, יָבִיאוּ שְׁנִיִּים תַּחְתֵּיהֶן.

All the vessels that were in the Temple had seconds and thirds for if the first became impure they would bring the second in its place.

| improve this answer | |
  • That's a good start. Just to Makeh Bepatish - do you know what tools specifically - it appears that the Mishnah speaks of simple tools like knives, bowls etc, but not Menorah and the Gold Altar. 2. Why does it translate "vessels"? – Al Berko Jul 16 '19 at 13:01
  • Maybe not the Mizbeach according to those who say it couldn't become Tamei? But why not everything else? Why do you think there wasn't a second menorah? – Double AA Jul 16 '19 at 13:05
  • יכין adds "אפי' שולחן, מדאפשר שיטמא:" What about Menorah? – Al Berko Jul 16 '19 at 13:08
  • @AlBerko menorah is seemingly included in "all vessels" – Double AA Jul 16 '19 at 14:25
  • 1
    related – msh210 Jul 16 '19 at 20:04

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .