0

צריך ליזהר באונאת אשתו לפי שדמעתה מצויה:‏
(C"M 228)

I understand that the whole chapter is about fraud (הונאה) and לשון נופלת על לשון, but the question is:

Does the fact that haMechaber listed this Halachah here between monetary laws imply that it can be claimed in court and be payable?

  • 2
    Why not ask about אונאת דברים in general? There’s no payment for any such case; why is it included in CM at all, rather than YD? – DonielF Apr 28 at 2:08
  • Can you support your implied claim that that line refers to verbal abuse rather than financial? – msh210 Apr 28 at 9:40
  • @msh210 Good point, isn't it "הונאת דברים"? – Al Berko Apr 28 at 9:43

You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .