6

Why is God not mentioned in the opening line of Pirkei Avot?

Moses received the Torah from Sinai and transmitted it to Joshua; Joshua to the Elders; the Elders to the Prophets; and the Prophets transmitted it to the Men of the Great Assembly. [Avot 1:1]

This line establishes the legitimacy of the Jewish tradition. We have dozens of names for God, but Sinai not one of them. Wouldn't this have been a wonderful occasion to stress Who everything comes from?

The Maharal addressed the issue:

"Moses received the Torah from God" would have implied that God's ability to transmit Torah was limited to Moshe as the receiver, which is not true.

A student learns Torah from a Rav, which creates a bond between them. Saying that Moses received the Torah from God implies this kind of bond, which is not respectful of God. Even though the Torah says in many places "And God spoke to Moses saying...", this doesn't imply the bond of Rav to student.

Emphasizing that Moses received the Torah "from Sinai" shows how integral the place (Sinai) was in this process.

God was speaking "to Himself" and it was Moses' responsibility to receive the Torah. It looked as if Moses was receiving the Torah "from Sinai" since God was not required to interact with him.

Are other explanations available?

My real question is: What would have been LOST by saying that Moses received the Torah from God?

1
  • off the cuff? All of Israel received the "Torah" from Hashem. But Moshe received the Oral Law at Sinai which makes it equal in value to the Torah that the people received. So the text is saying "the Torah which Moshe received at Sinai is equivalent to what the children of Israel received at Sinai". If we say "Moshe received it from Hashem" then the Oral law looks superior to that which the people received through Moshe at Sinai. Just a thought.
    – rosends
    Commented Mar 1, 2019 at 20:59

4 Answers 4

1

Good question!

In the Sefer נוצר חסד, a commentary on Pirkei Avot written by יצחק אייזיק יהודה יחיאל זצוק"ל מקאמרנא, (you can find more about him here) he gives an explanation on the first mishnah in Pirkei Avot (1:1) as to what would have been lost/it would not have been correct, by saying that Moshe received the Torah from Hashem. The explanation itself is in hebrew and very lengthy in so l will do my best to summarize his answer:

He explains that the Torah that is received directly from Hashem is not something that Moshe could have passed on. "For every matter there is an interpretation that requires 80 years," as is known from the teachings of the Arizal (haven’t been able to locate the source). In the Sefer עמק המלך it brings a story about Rabbi Avraham Halevi, who found the Arizal speaking in his sleep. When asked if the Rabbi would reveal what he had learned, the rabbi began to laugh and said, "I bear witness to heaven and earth, if I had taught for eighty consecutive years, I would not have been able to complete what I learned this time in the portion of Bilaam and the donkey." This Torah, which came from Hashem, is called the Torah of Atzilut (see here for explanation), which means a very high level of Torah learning (since Atzilut is the highest spiritual world) and to interpret that Torah and explain it, requires eighty years to convey what was received in one moment during sleep.

To make this make more sense, a comparison can be made to the contemporary reality where vast amounts of information can be transmitted with the push of a button. Similarly, although there is a vast distance between this and the Torah of Atzilut, the Torah is given from the mouth of Hashem in such a way that one who receives it needs 80 consecutive years to transmit even one part of what was received in a moment of sleep. The Arizal explains that any righteous person who reaches the state of אין (see here for explanation), meaning a very high level in spirituality, can merit receiving the Torah of Atzilut. The Baal Shem Tov also said that he knew righteous people who attained the state of אין and received Torah from the mouth of Hashem, yet they did not believe in themselves until their death. Consequently, this Torah of Atzilut that came from the mouth of Hashem is not something Moshe could have received from Hashem and passed on to Yehoshua. So until now it's just משה קיבל תורה מהקב״ה, period.

However, after what happened on the 17th of Tammuz with the sin of the golden calf and the breaking of the tablets, the manner of receiving the Torah was different with the second tablets. The Torah was given in a way that Hashem descended upon Har Sinai, which is considered the Torah of Briah (see here), meaning a level of Torah learning which is a step down. This is the Torah that was given to us, which Moshe received from Sinai and passed on to Yehoshua. Indeed, Moshe, who reached the level of אין, received the Torah from the mouth of Hashem. However, what he passed on to Joshua was only the Torah of בריאה– the Torah from Sinai. Moshe did not pass on to Yehoshua everything he received, since for example מה שתלמיד ותיק עתיד להורות/לומר/לחדש לפני רבו (see here) was given to Moshe but not Yehoshua and onwards. But rather he passed on the Torah of בריאה.

Therefore in summary, the reason it says משה קיבל תורה מסיני is because it refers to the form of receiving the Torah on the second tablets, which were given in the manner of Sinai, which is the aspect of Torah that comes from בריאה which was passed down from Moshe to Yehoshua and not אצילות which is the highest form which was only able to be passed down from Hashem to Moshe and includes a lot of Torah that we don't know.

0

Elsewhere the Talmud discusses in more detail this same process of disseminating the Oral law. In this version, Moshe receives the law directly from God. It seems nothing would be lost, because the same teaching is found with God at the front of the line.

Eruvin 54b

תנו רבנן כיצד סדר משנה משה למד מפי הגבורה נכנס אהרן ושנה לו משה פירקו נסתלק אהרן וישב לשמאל משה נכנסו בניו ושנה להן משה פירקן נסתלקו בניו אלעזר ישב לימין משה ואיתמר לשמאל אהרן רבי יהודה אומר לעולם אהרן לימין משה חוזר נכנסו זקנים ושנה להן משה פירקן נסתלקו זקנים נכנסו כל העם ושנה להן משה פירקן נמצאו ביד אהרן ארבעה ביד בניו שלשה וביד הזקנים שנים וביד כל העם אחד

The Gemara continues to discuss methods of Torah study. The Sages taught the following baraita: What was the order of teaching the Oral Law? How was the Oral Law first taught? Moses learned directly from the mouth of the Almighty. Aaron entered and sat before him, and Moses taught him his lesson as he had learned it from God. Aaron moved aside and sat to the left of Moses. Aaron’s sons entered, and Moses taught them their lesson while Aaron listened. Aaron’s sons moved aside; Elazar sat to the right of Moses and Itamar sat to the left of Aaron. Rabbi Yehuda disagreed with the first tanna with regard to the seating arrangements and said: Actually, Aaron would return to sit to the right of Moses. The elders entered and Moses taught them their lesson. The elders moved aside, and the entire nation entered and Moses taught them their lesson. Therefore, Aaron had heard the lesson four times, his sons heard it three times, the elders heard it twice, and the entire nation heard it once.

3
  • So Rebbe records the version which doesn't explicitly name Hashem in the Mishnah, and the version which does explicitly name Hashem he leaves as a Braisa? Why?
    – DonielF
    Commented Apr 3, 2019 at 21:05
  • @DonielF judaism.stackexchange.com/a/101504/16706 well look further tho
    – Dr. Shmuel
    Commented Apr 3, 2019 at 21:08
  • The text of the Braisa is not even close to that of the Mishnah. Thematically they're very similar, but the Braisa contains much more than the Mishnah.
    – DonielF
    Commented Apr 3, 2019 at 21:10
0

By stating Moshe received the Torah from G-d at the beginning of maseches Avos, dealing with personal growth would diminish its message. If Moshe received his greatness as a divine gift, that would not teach us anything beyond what we know that some people naturally (from G-d) are more gifted or able than others.

The Mishna Avos 1:1 is teaching a significanly stronger point: משֶׁה קִבֵּל תּוֹרָה מִסִּינַי - Moshe received the Torah from Sinai, meaning from the entire experience at Sinai, when Moshe led a nation to the covenant, described in parshiyot Yisro - Pikudei, also Shabbos 88a and many midrashim. Moshe's personal experience, when receiving the Torah, is giving us important lessons, specifically,

  1. Moshe's arguments with Angels why people have merit in receiving the Torah Gemara Bavli Shabbos 88b These arguments showed Moshe's deep care and belief in the greatness of human potential. He developed it as a prophet by leading former slaves to freedom.

  2. Moshe's learning experience when facing complexity of the law Shabbos 89a showed his willingless to be G-d humble servant. Moshe showed that he was a humble servant of G-d not only when winning over pharaoh or his army. Even when everything looked dark and the arrogant pharaoh imposed crushing labor on Jewish people, Moshe did not abandon his mission.

  3. Moshe's learning entire Torah and forgetting it as described in a parallel post See Nedarim 38a. Rav Chaim Shmulevitz in Sichos Mussar explains that Hashem taught him entire Torah and made him forget it to purify Moshe's mind. It was necessary, so that he could bring to the people not just a collection of mitzvos, but a good mind on how to think the Torah, how to live the Torah, and how to transform oneself with the Torah's help.

It is this experience of the Torah, experience of Sinai, which the maseches Avos is trying to capture through its words of wisdom, mussar, and deeds beyond the letter of the law.

-2

This is a preliminary answer, I'll work on improvements B"N.

As you noticed, unlike the explicit text of the Torah that was advertised for all nations ('written on the rocks in 70 languages), that describes the process of the receiving of the Torah in details (Exodus 19 and on), Pirkey Avot is [a part of] the Oral Torah, intended exclusively for the Jews and carefully hidden within the long Seder Nezikim.

As such, it does not have to mirror the text of the Torah in explaining the process. It points to one specific quality of G-d to refer to in its beginning and Sinai is such a word that describes that status the best.

So "Sinai" in the Mishnah's text stands for a certain G-d's quality relevant to the understanding of the transmission of the Torah. (I'm currently checking out what quality).

To be continued....

1
  • There’s nothing this post says that the OP doesn’t acknowledge. Of course Sinai is there for a reason and is a placeholder for Hashem; you haven’t explained why.
    – DonielF
    Commented Apr 2, 2019 at 1:12

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .