Timeline for Does Bishul Akum Apply To Half-Siblings
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2019 at 16:52 | history | edited | user15464 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 12 characters in body; edited tags
|
| Dec 25, 2018 at 15:08 | answer | added | user15464 | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 22, 2018 at 8:27 | comment | added | user18155 | There should be no reason to allow it (barring other considerations - perhaps darchei Shalom). You don't need to think up lots of examples where there is absolutely no reason to think that Jew X would have relations with non-Jew Y, and still it would be forbidden. For example, can a ger eat his parents' food made by them, even if kashrus considerations were not relevant? No. The intention of Chazal would be a lo plug - even when the reasons don't necessarily apply. Also, it would only help for the persons concerned - the food would be assur to Jews outside of that circle? | |
| Nov 21, 2018 at 3:01 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackJudaism/status/1065077717224312832 | ||
| Nov 20, 2018 at 22:08 | comment | added | chacham Nisan | In such a case where darkei shalom absolutely applies, it seems one could rely on the Rama's ruling l'chatchila regarding fire and possibly the Rashba's(?) ruling not requiring fire in a Jewish house(this needs more investigation since the father is not Jewish). See Shulchan Aruch Yoreh Deah 113:4, 6, & 7. This needs the judgement of a competent and understanding posek. | |
| Nov 20, 2018 at 20:21 | comment | added | Double AA♦ | Do we have any examples of subjectivity in this regard? It's not like male gentiles don't effect Bishul Akum for male Jews | |
| Nov 20, 2018 at 20:18 | history | edited | Isaac Moses♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| Nov 20, 2018 at 20:07 | history | edited | Aaron | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 272 characters in body
|
| Nov 20, 2018 at 19:54 | history | asked | Aaron | CC BY-SA 4.0 |