Timeline for Bringing korbanos for prior obligations when bais hamikdash is rebuilt
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2018 at 20:03 | comment | added | chortkov2 | As to why the Poskim don't mention it, I think I remember seeing a source explain that we will have to bring Karbanos as per Gemara Shabbos etc., but we will don't have to keep a record, because Eliyahu (or Urim veTumim) will tell us all what we are required to bring. I can't place the source offhand... | |
| Nov 5, 2018 at 20:02 | comment | added | chortkov2 | Sam - R' Yishmoel sinned when there was no Beis Hamikdash, yet planned on bringing one upon its rebuilding. This proves that he was obligated, otherwise he would be forbidden from bringing a "voluntary" Chatas. | |
| Nov 5, 2018 at 19:48 | comment | added | sam | Thats not what I meant,I meant that if one is obligated to bring a chatas if there was a bais hamikdash then they were scrupulous with this Inyun, but not necessarily is one obligated if there is no mikdash. Also this was not codified by the great halachists, why?(The fact that MA is the only one proves that this isn't common practice) either it is obligatory or not | |
| Nov 5, 2018 at 19:14 | comment | added | chortkov2 | Sam - One cannot bring a Korban Chatas voluntarily; it can only be brought if it is obligatory. If R' Yishmoel planned on bringing in, he would have to have thought it obligatory. And in Yuma 80, the Gemara isn't relating a story, it is instructing. | |
| Nov 5, 2018 at 18:54 | comment | added | sam | I don't understand how that gemara proves that it is obligatory, one can simply say that they were scrupulous with this Inyun. Also what did they do when the second bais hamikdash was rebuilt ,did they have 1000s of korbanos | |
| Nov 5, 2018 at 18:36 | history | answered | chortkov2 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |