3 Additional details ; added 10 characters in body; edited title
source | link

Why is the format for referencing Rambambooks sometimes backwards?

The Rambam is usually reference in the following way: פרק א׳ מהלכות ק״ש הלכה ט׳ - chapter 1 from from hilchos kerias shma, halacha 9.

Why is it referenced this way? Why not the way many other things are referenced, in order, which would be: הלכות ק״ש פרק א׳ הלכה ט׳ - hilchos kriyas shma, chapter 1, halacha 9.

This system has been in use for centuries, and even in commentarys referencing Rambam use this system.

Additionally, I saw a quote elsewhere of באר היטב like this: ס׳ א׳ מאו׳ח ס״ק ו - reversed as well!

Why is the format for referencing Rambam backwards?

The Rambam is usually reference in the following way: פרק א׳ מהלכות ק״ש הלכה ט׳ - chapter 1 from from hilchos kerias shma, halacha 9.

Why is it referenced this way? Why not the way many other things are referenced, which would be: הלכות ק״ש פרק א׳ הלכה ט׳ - hilchos kriyas shma, chapter 1, halacha 9.

This system has been in use for centuries, and even in commentarys referencing Rambam use this system.

Why is the format for referencing books sometimes backwards?

The Rambam is usually reference in the following way: פרק א׳ מהלכות ק״ש הלכה ט׳ - chapter 1 from from hilchos kerias shma, halacha 9.

Why is it referenced this way? Why not the way many other things are referenced, in order, which would be: הלכות ק״ש פרק א׳ הלכה ט׳ - hilchos kriyas shma, chapter 1, halacha 9.

This system has been in use for centuries, and even in commentarys referencing Rambam use this system.

Additionally, I saw a quote elsewhere of באר היטב like this: ס׳ א׳ מאו׳ח ס״ק ו - reversed as well!

2 Continuity?
source | link

The Rambam is usually reference in the following way: פרק א׳ מהלכות ק״ש הלכה ט׳ פרק א׳ מהלכות ק״ש הלכה ט׳ - chapter 1 from from hilchos kerias shma, halacha 9.

Why is it referenced this way? Why not the way many other things are referenced, which would be: הלכות ק״ש פרק א׳ הלכה ט׳ הלכות ק״ש פרק א׳ הלכה ט׳ - hilchos kriyas shma, chapter 1, halacha 9.

This system has been in use for centuries, and even in commentarys referencing Rambam use this system.

The Rambam is usually reference in the following way: פרק א׳ מהלכות ק״ש הלכה ט׳ - chapter 1 from from hilchos kerias shma, halacha 9.

Why is it referenced this way? Why not the way many other things are referenced, which would be: הלכות ק״ש פרק א׳ הלכה ט׳ - hilchos kriyas shma, chapter 1, halacha 9.

This system has been in use for centuries, and even in commentarys referencing Rambam use this system.

The Rambam is usually reference in the following way: פרק א׳ מהלכות ק״ש הלכה ט׳ - chapter 1 from from hilchos kerias shma, halacha 9.

Why is it referenced this way? Why not the way many other things are referenced, which would be: הלכות ק״ש פרק א׳ הלכה ט׳ - hilchos kriyas shma, chapter 1, halacha 9.

This system has been in use for centuries, and even in commentarys referencing Rambam use this system.

    Tweeted twitter.com/StackJudaism/status/1023946894198951937
1
source | link

Why is the format for referencing Rambam backwards?

The Rambam is usually reference in the following way: פרק א׳ מהלכות ק״ש הלכה ט׳ - chapter 1 from from hilchos kerias shma, halacha 9.

Why is it referenced this way? Why not the way many other things are referenced, which would be: הלכות ק״ש פרק א׳ הלכה ט׳ - hilchos kriyas shma, chapter 1, halacha 9.

This system has been in use for centuries, and even in commentarys referencing Rambam use this system.