Timeline for What does it mean Halachicly: "Hamechaber omitted those Halochos"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2020 at 10:41 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Jul 25, 2018 at 13:41 | comment | added | Danny Schoemann | @DonielF - you'd first have to find a case of that happening. ("That" being a Halacha mentioned in the Rambam, Rif or Rosh that the Bet Yosef ignores.) As far as I can tell the Bet Yosef is comprehensive, to say the least. (But after many years, I'm noway near finished.) | |
| Jul 25, 2018 at 13:37 | history | edited | Danny Schoemann | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
As per Alex, explicitly answer the question.
|
| Jul 25, 2018 at 13:17 | comment | added | DonielF | This just pushes the question. What if they were left out of the Beis Yosef also? | |
| Jul 25, 2018 at 13:15 | history | edited | Danny Schoemann | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
As per DoubleAA - dangerous is in CM 427
|
| Jul 25, 2018 at 9:22 | history | answered | Danny Schoemann | CC BY-SA 4.0 |