Timeline for Is v'chai bahem a mitzvah?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aug 24, 2017 at 9:06 | comment | added | Tamir Evan | Maybe it is one of ha-Tzivuyim ha-Kolelim ha-Torah Kulah (translated as "'encompassing' directives" on chabad.org), mentioned in Shoresh / Kelal #4 of the introduction to Sefer ha-Mitzvot, which are not part of the 613 Mitzvot. (I don't know how that would affect pitting it against other considerations.) | |
Jul 10, 2017 at 11:01 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackJudaism/status/884366944568197120 | ||
Jul 7, 2017 at 18:08 | comment | added | DonielF | @hazoriz Perhaps. But in that case, it would be the second category - "live by them" implies "don't die by them." | |
Jul 7, 2017 at 17:30 | comment | added | hazoriz | It does not need to be a mitzvah to be gezairat hakasuv , I guess it only needs to be a chidush | |
Jul 5, 2017 at 20:31 | history | edited | Isaac Moses♦ |
edited tags
|
|
Jul 5, 2017 at 19:00 | review | Close votes | |||
Jul 6, 2017 at 8:56 | |||||
Jul 5, 2017 at 17:47 | answer | added | Yaacov Deane | timeline score: -3 | |
Jul 5, 2017 at 17:36 | comment | added | DonielF | @DanF Assuming that's a valid interpretation of v'nishmartem, even if it could push aside a lav, it couldn't push aside an aseh (shamor always means lav, and asi aseh v'dachi lo sa'aseh - not the other way around.) This passuk not only gives it a status of an aseh but would also make it impervious to asi aseh (eino docheh aseh v'lo sa'aseh). | |
Jul 5, 2017 at 17:32 | history | edited | DonielF | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 296 characters in body
|
Jul 5, 2017 at 16:21 | comment | added | DanF | Offhand, I wonder if this fits either as I think Venishmartem (in parshat Va'etchanan) is a mitzvah, and if so, what would this verse be adding? | |
Jul 5, 2017 at 16:02 | history | edited | DonielF | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 46 characters in body
|
Jul 5, 2017 at 15:37 | history | asked | DonielF | CC BY-SA 3.0 |