Timeline for Who can witness the sale of chametz?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2017 at 20:04 | history | edited | msh210♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| Apr 11, 2017 at 11:12 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackJudaism/status/851754741222825984 | ||
| Apr 10, 2017 at 18:39 | answer | added | Yehuda | timeline score: 3 | |
| Apr 10, 2017 at 17:26 | answer | added | MTL | timeline score: 0 | |
| Apr 10, 2017 at 17:21 | answer | added | David Kenner | timeline score: -1 | |
| Apr 10, 2017 at 16:58 | comment | added | Ted Hopp | @DavidKenner - Why would witnesses be unnecessary? Does it have to do with one party being a gentile? (As in, the sale is valid if it would be recognized as legally binding by a secular court?) Or is something else going on? | |
| Apr 9, 2017 at 22:40 | comment | added | David Kenner | The sale should still be valid without witnesses. It seems like a more official sale to have witnesses. | |
| Apr 9, 2017 at 22:31 | comment | added | Ted Hopp | @DoubleAA - Heh. Then the rabbi needs to recruit four witnesses. :) Seriously, though, how do other communities handle this? | |
| Apr 9, 2017 at 22:26 | comment | added | Double AA♦ | You could potentially have the rabbi do the whole aale twice: once overseen by A and B on behalf of C and D, and then vice versa. | |
| Apr 9, 2017 at 22:08 | history | asked | Ted Hopp | CC BY-SA 3.0 |