Timeline for Why did Memuchan make the decree on all women?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2019 at 20:28 | history | edited | termsofservice | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 158 characters in body
|
| Mar 14, 2017 at 4:35 | history | edited | termsofservice | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 117 characters in body
|
| Mar 14, 2017 at 0:40 | comment | added | termsofservice | Rashi does however say: ולא יעבור – חוק זה מביניהם, שיהא זה חוק ודת לכל הבוזה את בעלה, It may mean that זה is the death penalty. | |
| Mar 14, 2017 at 0:36 | history | edited | termsofservice | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 365 characters in body
|
| Mar 14, 2017 at 0:30 | comment | added | termsofservice | @mevaqesh Yeah, I was just writing that this question answers why Memukhan extended the decree, so not a huge logical step to extend the death penalty to them to. I am going to look up the sources the OP mentions to evaluate the assumption. | |
| Mar 14, 2017 at 0:27 | comment | added | mevaqesh | Your call. Personally I would leave it as it addressed why Memukhan generally decreed against women. You might want to mention that the basic assumption of the OP is incorrect. | |
| Mar 14, 2017 at 0:24 | history | edited | termsofservice | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 7 characters in body
|
| Mar 14, 2017 at 0:24 | comment | added | termsofservice | @mevaqesh oh you are totally correct, I completely misread the OP's question, should I leave this as an answer? | |
| Mar 14, 2017 at 0:23 | comment | added | mevaqesh | Note that this answer doesn't address the question that the OP asked (apparently based on a misreading of Rashi) of why Memukhan decreed that all other women would be killed. However, it could be that the question stands without it. | |
| Mar 14, 2017 at 0:16 | history | answered | termsofservice | CC BY-SA 3.0 |