Timeline for How did they breathe during the plague of darkness?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
27 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 6, 2022 at 19:49 | comment | added | Dov | Refer to the Yalkut Meam Loez | |
Apr 6, 2022 at 19:45 | answer | added | shimshon | timeline score: 1 | |
Apr 13, 2017 at 12:41 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://judaism.stackexchange.com/ with https://judaism.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Feb 7, 2017 at 14:31 | comment | added | DanF | Even with that idea, how does sitting in one place, even for days, suffocate you - unless you're a hospital patient or bored ;-) ? | |
Feb 7, 2017 at 9:50 | review | Close votes | |||
Feb 7, 2017 at 17:01 | |||||
Feb 7, 2017 at 9:13 | comment | added | Danny Schoemann | @Chaim - how did you get to that conclusion? I am trying to figure out what caused them to sit in one place - and how come that "stopper" didn't suffocate them. | |
Feb 7, 2017 at 9:13 | comment | added | Danny Schoemann | @DanF - I didn't say they couldn't breathe - I am trying to figure out what caused them to sit in one place - and how come that "stopper" didn't suffocate them. | |
Feb 6, 2017 at 23:37 | comment | added | Chaim | The question takes for granted that breathing is a form of movement. Does anyone here disagree with that premise? | |
Feb 6, 2017 at 22:30 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackJudaism/status/828732697346527232 | ||
Feb 6, 2017 at 18:26 | comment | added | DanF | I'm puzzled by some premise in your question. One can sit in one place and still breathe. How do you infer that they weren't able to breathe? | |
Feb 6, 2017 at 17:12 | answer | added | sam | timeline score: 5 | |
Feb 6, 2017 at 16:27 | answer | added | mevaqesh | timeline score: 4 | |
Feb 6, 2017 at 15:15 | answer | added | bondonk | timeline score: 1 | |
Feb 6, 2017 at 15:10 | answer | added | user6591 | timeline score: 8 | |
Feb 6, 2017 at 14:03 | comment | added | bondonk | Miracle darkness stopped them moving and they breathed. | |
Feb 6, 2017 at 14:01 | comment | added | Danny Schoemann | @bondonk - I never said that. All I know for sure (based on Psukim) is that they didn't get up for 3 days and that it was dark. Even in the darkest darkness one can move. Even blind people move around. What was stopping them from moving and how did it allow them to breathe? | |
Feb 6, 2017 at 13:54 | comment | added | bondonk | I think you would need to equally source that miraculous darkness is thick/non-breathable/liquid-like? | |
Feb 6, 2017 at 13:53 | history | edited | Danny Schoemann | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 80 characters in body
|
Feb 6, 2017 at 13:53 | comment | added | Danny Schoemann | @bondonk - I'm fine with that if you can source it. | |
Feb 6, 2017 at 13:40 | comment | added | bondonk | Its a miraculous darkness with no analogue in nature... Why cant it just make them not see/stand up but let them breathe? | |
Feb 6, 2017 at 13:24 | comment | added | Danny Schoemann | @kouty - that's interesting - I wonder if there's anybody who talks about it. | |
Feb 6, 2017 at 13:21 | history | edited | Danny Schoemann | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
To clarify, based on the comments:
|
Feb 6, 2017 at 13:15 | comment | added | Danny Schoemann | @bondonk - let me clarify the question - the Pasuk clearly says that couldn't get up. | |
Feb 6, 2017 at 10:31 | comment | added | bondonk | Whats wrong with saying that it was 'thick' in a metaphorical sense? i.e. they couldn't move but could breathe? | |
Feb 6, 2017 at 10:02 | comment | added | kouty | perhaps there was also air as e. g. there is air in a fibrous matter | |
Feb 6, 2017 at 9:51 | history | edited | Danny Schoemann | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
Feb 6, 2017 at 9:22 | history | asked | Danny Schoemann | CC BY-SA 3.0 |