Timeline for Why take t'ruma? Aren't people trusted to do so?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 16, 2020 at 10:41 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
Oct 19, 2016 at 15:01 | comment | added | kouty | OK you want shut regardind the end of trust in everyvody concerning truma gdola | |
Oct 19, 2016 at 14:58 | comment | added | msh210♦ | "Obviously, something has changed over the years. What is it? Was there a decision made at some point that people are no longer trusted to take t'ruma? If so, when and by whom was that decision made and accepted? Or, if not, then what happened to cause the common practice today that people take t'ruma from produce acquired from someone not trusted to tithe?" So you're saying there was no such decision (p'sak), it's just a reasonable assumption by the masses? You may be right. Can you support that implied claim? | |
Oct 19, 2016 at 14:34 | history | edited | kouty | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 6 characters in body
|
Oct 19, 2016 at 14:05 | comment | added | kouty | I wiĺ rewrite it | |
Oct 19, 2016 at 13:42 | comment | added | kouty | 1 teh nussschbalready exist in mishna 5, 2. 2 dmay was a special problem of ame haarets already at mikdash time and not linked to modern people who are at greater risk. I.e. to skip all matanot | |
Oct 19, 2016 at 13:32 | comment | added | msh210♦ | I don't see how this answers the question. | |
Oct 19, 2016 at 12:16 | history | edited | kouty | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 127 characters in body
|
Oct 19, 2016 at 11:37 | history | edited | kouty | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 33 characters in body
|
Oct 19, 2016 at 11:31 | history | answered | kouty | CC BY-SA 3.0 |