Skip to main content
added 1027 characters in body
Source Link
kouty
  • 23.1k
  • 3
  • 29
  • 60

In Tora

Thanks to DoubleAA, I understand a little better the OP.Baal keri status originally concern uncleanness and cleanness laws and not prayer or learning Torah;see Mishna Kelim 1, 1(semen makes unclean the person that touches it and the person from witch it originates). The verses cited above in the OP are part of those laws.
A large number of verses matters laws of uncleanness-cleanness. There areperformative statements. You can see also that "Sifrey Mitsvot" include him in the 613. But it must be carefully examined. I will quote one excerpts from verses and from Sefer Hachinuch: A verse(numbers 19, 19) says:
And the clean person shall sprinkle upon the unclean on the third day, and on the seventh day; and on the seventh day he shall purify him; and he shall wash his clothes, and bathe himself in water, and shall be clean at even
Chinuch 399 שנצטוינו בדיני מי נדה, כלומר, בדיני מי הזיה, דהינו מים חיים מערבים באפר פרה, שמזין בהם על הטמאיםWe were ordained to follow laws...,There is a machloket between Rambam and Ramban if we should count laws of cleanness-uncleanness among the 613. So the majority of this laws says: in order to become clean, he shall bathe all hisflesh in water...

In Tora

Baal keri status originally concern uncleanness and cleanness laws and not prayer or learning Torah;see Mishna Kelim 1, 1(semen makes unclean the person that touches it and the person from witch it originates). The verses cited above in the OP are part of those laws.

In Tora

Baal keri status originally concern uncleanness and cleanness laws and not prayer or learning Torah;see Mishna Kelim 1, 1(semen makes unclean the person that touches it and the person from witch it originates). The verses cited above in the OP are part of those laws.

In Tora

Thanks to DoubleAA, I understand a little better the OP.Baal keri status originally concern uncleanness and cleanness laws and not prayer or learning Torah;see Mishna Kelim 1, 1(semen makes unclean the person that touches it and the person from witch it originates). The verses cited above in the OP are part of those laws.
A large number of verses matters laws of uncleanness-cleanness. There areperformative statements. You can see also that "Sifrey Mitsvot" include him in the 613. But it must be carefully examined. I will quote one excerpts from verses and from Sefer Hachinuch: A verse(numbers 19, 19) says:
And the clean person shall sprinkle upon the unclean on the third day, and on the seventh day; and on the seventh day he shall purify him; and he shall wash his clothes, and bathe himself in water, and shall be clean at even
Chinuch 399 שנצטוינו בדיני מי נדה, כלומר, בדיני מי הזיה, דהינו מים חיים מערבים באפר פרה, שמזין בהם על הטמאיםWe were ordained to follow laws...,There is a machloket between Rambam and Ramban if we should count laws of cleanness-uncleanness among the 613. So the majority of this laws says: in order to become clean, he shall bathe all hisflesh in water...
added 231 characters in body
Source Link
kouty
  • 23.1k
  • 3
  • 29
  • 60

ThereNowedays, is Baal keri subject to specific laws? There is a Machloket between Rif and Rambam. The subjectThis topic is beginningcovered in massechet Brachot. mishna Chapter 3,4.(in Gemara folio 20B)

  I will quote the Bartenura on the Mishna concerning baal keri. as an abstract of the Gemara and after thisrambam, and then I will try to explain through reading a few lines of Gemara the difference between diverse Rishonim. Bartenura:

עֶזְרָא תִּקֵּן שֶׁלֹּא יִקְרָא בַּעַל קֶרִי בַּתּוֹרָה בֵּין שֶׁרָאָה קְרִי לְאוֹנְסוֹ בֵּין ‏לִרְצוֹנוֹ עַד שֶׁיִּטְבֹּל. וְלֹא מִפְּנֵי טֻמְאָה וְטָהֳרָה שֶׁאֵין דִּבְרֵי תוֹרָה מְקַבְּלִין טֻמְאָה אֶלָּא כְּדֵי שֶׁלֹּא יִהְיוּ תַּלְמִידֵי חֲכָמִים מְצוּיִין אֵצֶל נְשׁוֹתֵיהֶן כְּתַרְנְגוֹלִים ... וּכְבָר נִפְסְקָה הַהֲלָכָה דְּבִטְּלוּהָ לִטְבִילוּתָא, וּבַעֲלֵי קֶרְיִין קוֹרִין קְרִיאַת שְׁמַע כְּדַרְכָּן וְעוֹסְקִין בַּתּוֹרָה וּמִתְפַּלְּלִין וּמְבָרְכִין כָּל הַבְּרָכוֹת וְאֵין מְעַרְעֵר בַּדָּבָר ‏
Ezra ordinatedordinate that a man after having seminal emission do not read ToraTorah, no matter if this emission was adventitious or deliberate, until he immerse in Mikve. The reason for this is not uncleannesuncleanness, since words of ToraTorah are not susceptible of uncleanness, but the aim is to avoid that scholar might allwaysalways be with their wives like cocks.
andor
Tora;Torah;
On the basis of this they laid down that sufferers from (gonorrhoea) [urethral discharge, gleet], lepers, and those who had intercourse with niddoth are permitted to read the Torah, the Prophets and the Hagiographa, and to study the Mishnah, [Midrash] the Talmud, halachoth and haggadoth, but {despite uncleanness they may be in fear and trembling (according to Rashi)} a ba'al keri is forbidden {his uncleanness is a consequence of lightness and prentenciousnesspretentiousness}.
ordinatedordinates
ToraTorah
ToraTorah
sefer(sefer
)
We will see that this is an interpretation of the Gemara and not a translationcitation of the Gemara. theirThe sources are probably 3 passages of Gemara
a chachamteacher who was teaching in a low voice,
,
(zav, boel niddah, etc)
athe following

But this ordinance had been canceleddon't spread in all Israel, and most people failled to follow it, consequently it would annulled (Rambam Kriat Shema 4, 8)

toratorah

But Rabenu Yona and Rambam do not agree and the Shulchan Aruch follows clearly the Rambam and wrote that the "Ezra's immersion" was completely cancelled S.A. O.C. 88

There is a Machloket between Rif and Rambam. The subject is beginning in massechet Brachot. mishna Chapter 3,4.(in Gemara folio 20B)

I will quote the Bartenura on the Mishna concerning baal keri. as an abstract of the Gemara and after this explain through a few lines of Gemara the difference between diverse Rishonim. Bartenura:

עֶזְרָא תִּקֵּן שֶׁלֹּא יִקְרָא בַּעַל קֶרִי בַּתּוֹרָה בֵּין שֶׁרָאָה קְרִי לְאוֹנְסוֹ בֵּין ‏לִרְצוֹנוֹ עַד שֶׁיִּטְבֹּל. וְלֹא מִפְּנֵי טֻמְאָה וְטָהֳרָה שֶׁאֵין דִּבְרֵי תוֹרָה מְקַבְּלִין טֻמְאָה אֶלָּא כְּדֵי שֶׁלֹּא יִהְיוּ תַּלְמִידֵי חֲכָמִים מְצוּיִין אֵצֶל נְשׁוֹתֵיהֶן כְּתַרְנְגוֹלִים ... וּכְבָר נִפְסְקָה הַהֲלָכָה דְּבִטְּלוּהָ לִטְבִילוּתָא, וּבַעֲלֵי קֶרְיִין קוֹרִין קְרִיאַת שְׁמַע כְּדַרְכָּן וְעוֹסְקִין בַּתּוֹרָה וּמִתְפַּלְּלִין וּמְבָרְכִין כָּל הַבְּרָכוֹת וְאֵין מְעַרְעֵר בַּדָּבָר ‏
Ezra ordinated that a man after having seminal emission do not read Tora, no matter if this emission was adventitious or deliberate, until he immerse in Mikve. The reason for this is not uncleannes, since words of Tora are not susceptible of uncleanness, but the aim is to avoid that scholar might allways be with their wives like cocks.
and
Tora;
On the basis of this they laid down that sufferers from (gonorrhoea) [urethral discharge, gleet], lepers, and those who had intercourse with niddoth are permitted to read the Torah, the Prophets and the Hagiographa, and to study the Mishnah, [Midrash] the Talmud, halachoth and haggadoth, but {despite uncleanness they may be in fear and trembling (according to Rashi)} a ba'al keri is forbidden {his uncleanness is a consequence of lightness and prentenciousness}.
ordinated
Tora
Tora
sefer
We will see that this is an interpretation of the Gemara and not a translation of the Gemara. their sources are probably 3 passages of Gemara
a chacham
a

But this ordinance had been canceled

tora

But Rabenu Yona and Rambam do not agree and the Shulchan Aruch follows clearly the Rambam that the "Ezra's immersion" was completely cancelled S.A. O.C. 88

Nowedays, is Baal keri subject to specific laws? There is a Machloket between Rif and Rambam. This topic is covered in massechet Brachot. mishna Chapter 3,4.(in Gemara folio 20B)

  I will quote the Bartenura on the Mishna concerning baal keri. as an abstract of Gemara and rambam, and then I will try to explain through reading a few lines of Gemara. Bartenura:

עֶזְרָא תִּקֵּן שֶׁלֹּא יִקְרָא בַּעַל קֶרִי בַּתּוֹרָה בֵּין שֶׁרָאָה קְרִי לְאוֹנְסוֹ בֵּין ‏לִרְצוֹנוֹ עַד שֶׁיִּטְבֹּל. וְלֹא מִפְּנֵי טֻמְאָה וְטָהֳרָה שֶׁאֵין דִּבְרֵי תוֹרָה מְקַבְּלִין טֻמְאָה אֶלָּא כְּדֵי שֶׁלֹּא יִהְיוּ תַּלְמִידֵי חֲכָמִים מְצוּיִין אֵצֶל נְשׁוֹתֵיהֶן כְּתַרְנְגוֹלִים ... וּכְבָר נִפְסְקָה הַהֲלָכָה דְּבִטְּלוּהָ לִטְבִילוּתָא, וּבַעֲלֵי קֶרְיִין קוֹרִין קְרִיאַת שְׁמַע כְּדַרְכָּן וְעוֹסְקִין בַּתּוֹרָה וּמִתְפַּלְּלִין וּמְבָרְכִין כָּל הַבְּרָכוֹת וְאֵין מְעַרְעֵר בַּדָּבָר ‏
Ezra ordinate that a man after having seminal emission do not read Torah, no matter if this emission was adventitious or deliberate, until he immerse in Mikve. The reason for this is not uncleanness, since words of Torah are not susceptible of uncleanness, but the aim is to avoid that scholar might always be with their wives like cocks.
or
Torah;
On the basis of this they laid down that sufferers from (gonorrhoea) [urethral discharge, gleet], lepers, and those who had intercourse with niddoth are permitted to read the Torah, the Prophets and the Hagiographa, and to study the Mishnah, [Midrash] the Talmud, halachoth and haggadoth, but {despite uncleanness they may be in fear and trembling (according to Rashi)} a ba'al keri is forbidden {his uncleanness is a consequence of lightness and pretentiousness}.
ordinates
Torah
Torah
(sefer
)
We will see that this is an interpretation of the Gemara and not a citation of the Gemara. The sources are probably 3 passages of Gemara
teacher who was teaching in a low voice,
,
(zav, boel niddah, etc)
the following

But this ordinance don't spread in all Israel, and most people failled to follow it, consequently it would annulled (Rambam Kriat Shema 4, 8)

torah

But Rabenu Yona and Rambam do not agree and the Shulchan Aruch follows the Rambam and wrote that the "Ezra's immersion" was completely cancelled S.A. O.C. 88

few errors, few frenglish
Source Link
kouty
  • 23.1k
  • 3
  • 29
  • 60
Torah doesn't need cleanness: See Gemara Brachot 22a
On the basis of this they laid down that sufferers from (gonorrhoea) [urethral discharge, gleet], lepers, and those who had intercourse with niddoth are permitted to read the Torah, the Prophets and the Hagiographa, and to study the Mishnah, [Midrash] the Talmud, halachoth and haggadoth, but {despite uncleanness they may be in fear and trembling (according to Rashi)} a ba'al keri is forbidden {his uncleanness is a consequence of lightness and prentenciousness}.
EzraEzra
specific
.
Bet Din after the generation of Ezra extended the ordinance to prayer too(Rambam tefila 4, 4; as shows the next mishna, "he was praying and he recalled that he was baal keri..
")
and most commentatorsfollowing Rambam sefer Ahava hilchot Tefila chapter 4, halacha 4
We will see that this is an interpretation of the Gemara and not a translation of the Gemara. their sources are probably 2 3 passages of Gemara
1.-
(22A)
(a chacham that avoided to spread widely that it suffice to use 9 kabin)
2.- the Brayta that point discrepancy between Baal keri
the other uncleans, 3.- and
Ezra ordained that a healthy man whose emission is voluntaryhealthy man whose emission is voluntary must immerse in forty se'ahs
He buildedThey built
conclusionswords

The Rif concluded following Rav Hayi Gaon that for prayer the ordinance ishas not been annulled (see also Tosfot) and Baal Keri need at least 9 Kabim.

Magen Avrohom, cited in Mishna Brura calls those the continue the minhag as Anshey maasse (people with a great behavior). This minhag is valuablelaudable (note that it is different from the 'daily Tevila'. Daily tvila is not needed if a man is not Baal keri. On the contrary, in Gemara we see several evidences that prove that scholar were not going to Mikve if they were not baal keri). {In Gemara, different types of Baal keri are distinguished, immersion in mikve and 9 kabim water thrown, in Rishonim, dinim of Chatsitsa, Kelim and Sheuvim. see in poskim}

Ezra
and most commentators
We will see that this is an interpretation of the Gemara and not a translation of the Gemara. their sources are probably 2 passages of Gemara
Ezra ordained that a healthy man whose emission is voluntary must immerse in forty se'ahs
He builded
conclusions

The Rif concluded following Rav Hayi Gaon that for prayer the ordinance is not annulled (see also Tosfot) and Baal Keri need at least 9 Kabim.

Magen Avrohom, cited in Mishna Brura calls those the continue the minhag as Anshey maasse (people with a great behavior). This minhag is valuable (note that it is different from the 'daily Tevila'). {In Gemara, different types of Baal keri are distinguished, immersion in mikve and 9 kabim water thrown, in Rishonim, dinim of Chatsitsa and Sheuvim. see in poskim}

Torah doesn't need cleanness: See Gemara Brachot 22a
On the basis of this they laid down that sufferers from (gonorrhoea) [urethral discharge, gleet], lepers, and those who had intercourse with niddoth are permitted to read the Torah, the Prophets and the Hagiographa, and to study the Mishnah, [Midrash] the Talmud, halachoth and haggadoth, but {despite uncleanness they may be in fear and trembling (according to Rashi)} a ba'al keri is forbidden {his uncleanness is a consequence of lightness and prentenciousness}.
Ezra
specific
.
Bet Din after the generation of Ezra extended the ordinance to prayer too(Rambam tefila 4, 4; as shows the next mishna, "he was praying and he recalled that he was baal keri..
")
following Rambam sefer Ahava hilchot Tefila chapter 4, halacha 4
We will see that this is an interpretation of the Gemara and not a translation of the Gemara. their sources are probably 3 passages of Gemara
1.-
(22A)
(a chacham that avoided to spread widely that it suffice to use 9 kabin)
2.- the Brayta that point discrepancy between Baal keri
the other uncleans, 3.- and
Ezra ordained that a healthy man whose emission is voluntary must immerse in forty se'ahs
They built
words

The Rif concluded following Rav Hayi Gaon that for prayer the ordinance has not been annulled (see also Tosfot) and Baal Keri need at least 9 Kabim.

Magen Avrohom, cited in Mishna Brura calls those the continue the minhag as Anshey maasse (people with a great behavior). This minhag is laudable (note that it is different from the 'daily Tevila'. Daily tvila is not needed if a man is not Baal keri. On the contrary, in Gemara we see several evidences that prove that scholar were not going to Mikve if they were not baal keri). {In Gemara, different types of Baal keri are distinguished, immersion in mikve and 9 kabim water thrown, in Rishonim, dinim of Chatsitsa, Kelim and Sheuvim. see in poskim}

added 12 characters in body
Source Link
kouty
  • 23.1k
  • 3
  • 29
  • 60
Loading
deleted 3 characters in body
Source Link
kouty
  • 23.1k
  • 3
  • 29
  • 60
Loading
cleanness of presentation
Source Link
kouty
  • 23.1k
  • 3
  • 29
  • 60
Loading
cleanness of presentation
Source Link
kouty
  • 23.1k
  • 3
  • 29
  • 60
Loading
cleanness of presentation
Source Link
kouty
  • 23.1k
  • 3
  • 29
  • 60
Loading
added 3 characters in body
Source Link
kouty
  • 23.1k
  • 3
  • 29
  • 60
Loading
english
Source Link
kouty
  • 23.1k
  • 3
  • 29
  • 60
Loading
english
Source Link
kouty
  • 23.1k
  • 3
  • 29
  • 60
Loading
deleted 613 characters in body
Source Link
kouty
  • 23.1k
  • 3
  • 29
  • 60
Loading
added 42 characters in body
Source Link
kouty
  • 23.1k
  • 3
  • 29
  • 60
Loading
added 143 characters in body
Source Link
kouty
  • 23.1k
  • 3
  • 29
  • 60
Loading
added 205 characters in body
Source Link
kouty
  • 23.1k
  • 3
  • 29
  • 60
Loading
added 414 characters in body
Source Link
kouty
  • 23.1k
  • 3
  • 29
  • 60
Loading
Source Link
kouty
  • 23.1k
  • 3
  • 29
  • 60
Loading