Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 7, 2015 at 18:43 answer added user6591 timeline score: 1
Aug 7, 2015 at 17:02 comment added Salmononius2 @DoubleAA IIRC, you were historically not actually required to remove Tefillin when urinating, covering it was enough. Seemingly urinating wasn't considered as "disgusting" as flatulating.
Aug 7, 2015 at 16:56 comment added Double AA @Salmononius2 (first comment) So why isn't urination a problem?
Aug 7, 2015 at 16:44 comment added Salmononius2 AFAIK, no one mentions the requirement of needing to clean oneself before continuing prayer, while they do mention waiting for the smell to pass. I'm assuming that if cleaning was required, that would be mentioned too. You're right about the terminology 'Guf Naki', which seems to imply some sort of physical uncleanliness.
Aug 7, 2015 at 16:32 comment added hazoriz @Salmononius2 how do you know you do not need to? and why is it called a clean body (guf noki)?
Aug 7, 2015 at 16:31 comment added Salmononius2 As an aside, it likely isn't due to physical particals stuck to the body, for if that was the reason, you'd then need to wipe before continuing praying.
Aug 7, 2015 at 16:30 comment added Salmononius2 What about simply: "It's impolite and inappropriate conduct while wearing an object as holy as Tefillin?"
Aug 7, 2015 at 16:16 history edited msh210 CC BY-SA 3.0
I assume this is what was meant.
Aug 7, 2015 at 16:15 history edited hazoriz CC BY-SA 3.0
edited body
Aug 7, 2015 at 16:09 history asked hazoriz CC BY-SA 3.0