8 replaced http://chabadlibrary.org/books/default.aspx?furl= with http://chabadlibrary.org/books
source | link

you question is caused by the modern left view that if a minority wants to hit us (i.e. through rooks that can kill) we should not shoot back, but we should try to appease them (may be not the throwers themselves but their community)

(i am not saying that we should not love a minority, it is just if they want to take something from us we need to protect ourselves) (the world can not exist only with chesed or only with gevura we need a balance)

Judaism respects its old traditions that we only need to appease someone that is stronger then us (in an ideal situation it should Only be G-D all-mighty), but if someone is planing to possibly in the future KILL us we should protect ourselves even by desecrating shabbos (i understand that desecrating shabbos is worse then killing a gentile (because we have a law that we should not save them))

shulchan aruch 329.6

6 If non-Jews attack a Jewish town and have come for the sake of /the residents’/ possessions one may not desecrate the Shabbos because of this. /However,/ if they have come with the object of /taking Jewish/ life, and even if it is not clear /why they have come/, one must go out with weapons and desecrate the Shabbos /in order/ to /resist/ them. If /the attack is/ on a city that is close to the border /,then,/ even if they have come only for the sake of /pillaging/ straw or stubble one must desecrate the Shabbos /in order/ to /resist/ them. Gloss: Even if they have not yet come but intend to come. (…)

the shulchan aruch harav 329.6 endshulchan aruch harav 329.6 end it seam that even if they will not kill us but they only take our land

we need to listen to an expert shulchan aruch harav 328.10shulchan aruch harav 328.10

even if we do not want to we need to be forced shulchan aruch harav 328.11shulchan aruch harav 328.11

so in these cases it seams that the halocho will be that we need to get professional military (just as by medical) advice (similar to @dotancohen's comment) what needs to be done to save jewith life (or land according to the rav 329.6) from any possible threat, and we need to force ourselves even if we do not want to) and not make the mistakes that israel constantly made in having politicians decide military tactics.

ps Rabbi Meir Kahane had some good theories on how to protect jewish life

from history demolition of terrorists' homes seams not to be enough

you question is caused by the modern left view that if a minority wants to hit us (i.e. through rooks that can kill) we should not shoot back, but we should try to appease them (may be not the throwers themselves but their community)

(i am not saying that we should not love a minority, it is just if they want to take something from us we need to protect ourselves) (the world can not exist only with chesed or only with gevura we need a balance)

Judaism respects its old traditions that we only need to appease someone that is stronger then us (in an ideal situation it should Only be G-D all-mighty), but if someone is planing to possibly in the future KILL us we should protect ourselves even by desecrating shabbos (i understand that desecrating shabbos is worse then killing a gentile (because we have a law that we should not save them))

shulchan aruch 329.6

6 If non-Jews attack a Jewish town and have come for the sake of /the residents’/ possessions one may not desecrate the Shabbos because of this. /However,/ if they have come with the object of /taking Jewish/ life, and even if it is not clear /why they have come/, one must go out with weapons and desecrate the Shabbos /in order/ to /resist/ them. If /the attack is/ on a city that is close to the border /,then,/ even if they have come only for the sake of /pillaging/ straw or stubble one must desecrate the Shabbos /in order/ to /resist/ them. Gloss: Even if they have not yet come but intend to come. (…)

the shulchan aruch harav 329.6 end it seam that even if they will not kill us but they only take our land

we need to listen to an expert shulchan aruch harav 328.10

even if we do not want to we need to be forced shulchan aruch harav 328.11

so in these cases it seams that the halocho will be that we need to get professional military (just as by medical) advice (similar to @dotancohen's comment) what needs to be done to save jewith life (or land according to the rav 329.6) from any possible threat, and we need to force ourselves even if we do not want to) and not make the mistakes that israel constantly made in having politicians decide military tactics.

ps Rabbi Meir Kahane had some good theories on how to protect jewish life

from history demolition of terrorists' homes seams not to be enough

you question is caused by the modern left view that if a minority wants to hit us (i.e. through rooks that can kill) we should not shoot back, but we should try to appease them (may be not the throwers themselves but their community)

(i am not saying that we should not love a minority, it is just if they want to take something from us we need to protect ourselves) (the world can not exist only with chesed or only with gevura we need a balance)

Judaism respects its old traditions that we only need to appease someone that is stronger then us (in an ideal situation it should Only be G-D all-mighty), but if someone is planing to possibly in the future KILL us we should protect ourselves even by desecrating shabbos (i understand that desecrating shabbos is worse then killing a gentile (because we have a law that we should not save them))

shulchan aruch 329.6

6 If non-Jews attack a Jewish town and have come for the sake of /the residents’/ possessions one may not desecrate the Shabbos because of this. /However,/ if they have come with the object of /taking Jewish/ life, and even if it is not clear /why they have come/, one must go out with weapons and desecrate the Shabbos /in order/ to /resist/ them. If /the attack is/ on a city that is close to the border /,then,/ even if they have come only for the sake of /pillaging/ straw or stubble one must desecrate the Shabbos /in order/ to /resist/ them. Gloss: Even if they have not yet come but intend to come. (…)

the shulchan aruch harav 329.6 end it seam that even if they will not kill us but they only take our land

we need to listen to an expert shulchan aruch harav 328.10

even if we do not want to we need to be forced shulchan aruch harav 328.11

so in these cases it seams that the halocho will be that we need to get professional military (just as by medical) advice (similar to @dotancohen's comment) what needs to be done to save jewith life (or land according to the rav 329.6) from any possible threat, and we need to force ourselves even if we do not want to) and not make the mistakes that israel constantly made in having politicians decide military tactics.

ps Rabbi Meir Kahane had some good theories on how to protect jewish life

from history demolition of terrorists' homes seams not to be enough

7 http://meta.judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/1127/should-we-censor-the-term-goy-when-used-in-english-to-mean-gentile
source | link

you question is caused by the modern left view that if a minority wants to hit us (i.e. through rooks that can kill) we should not shoot back, but we should try to appease them (may be not the throwers themselves but their community)

(i am not saying that we should not love a minority, it is just if they want to take something from us we need to protect ourselves) (the world can not exist only with chesed or only with gevura we need a balance)

Judaism respects its old traditions that we only need to appease someone that is stronger then us (in an ideal situation it should Only be G-D all-mighty), but if someone is planing to possibly in the future KILL us we should protect ourselves even by desecrating shabbos (i understand that desecrating shabbos is worse then killing a goygentile (because we have a law that we should not save them))

shulchan aruch 329.6

6 If non-Jews attack a Jewish town and have come for the sake of /the residents’/ possessions one may not desecrate the Shabbos because of this. /However,/ if they have come with the object of /taking Jewish/ life, and even if it is not clear /why they have come/, one must go out with weapons and desecrate the Shabbos /in order/ to /resist/ them. If /the attack is/ on a city that is close to the border /,then,/ even if they have come only for the sake of /pillaging/ straw or stubble one must desecrate the Shabbos /in order/ to /resist/ them. Gloss: Even if they have not yet come but intend to come. (…)

the shulchan aruch harav 329.6 end it seam that even if they will not kill us but they only take our land

we need to listen to an expert shulchan aruch harav 328.10

even if we do not want to we need to be forced shulchan aruch harav 328.11

so in these cases it seams that the halocho will be that we need to get professional military (just as by medical) advice (similar to @dotancohen's comment) what needs to be done to save jewith life (or land according to the rav 329.6) from any possible threat, and we need to force ourselves even if we do not want to) and not make the mistakes that israel constantly made in having politicians decide military tactics.

ps Rabbi Meir Kahane had some good theories on how to protect jewish life

from history demolition of terrorists' homes seams not to be enough

you question is caused by the modern left view that if a minority wants to hit us (i.e. through rooks that can kill) we should not shoot back, but we should try to appease them (may be not the throwers themselves but their community)

(i am not saying that we should not love a minority, it is just if they want to take something from us we need to protect ourselves) (the world can not exist only with chesed or only with gevura we need a balance)

Judaism respects its old traditions that we only need to appease someone that is stronger then us (in an ideal situation it should Only be G-D all-mighty), but if someone is planing to possibly in the future KILL us we should protect ourselves even by desecrating shabbos (i understand that desecrating shabbos is worse then killing a goy (because we have a law that we should not save them))

shulchan aruch 329.6

6 If non-Jews attack a Jewish town and have come for the sake of /the residents’/ possessions one may not desecrate the Shabbos because of this. /However,/ if they have come with the object of /taking Jewish/ life, and even if it is not clear /why they have come/, one must go out with weapons and desecrate the Shabbos /in order/ to /resist/ them. If /the attack is/ on a city that is close to the border /,then,/ even if they have come only for the sake of /pillaging/ straw or stubble one must desecrate the Shabbos /in order/ to /resist/ them. Gloss: Even if they have not yet come but intend to come. (…)

the shulchan aruch harav 329.6 end it seam that even if they will not kill us but they only take our land

we need to listen to an expert shulchan aruch harav 328.10

even if we do not want to we need to be forced shulchan aruch harav 328.11

so in these cases it seams that the halocho will be that we need to get professional military (just as by medical) advice (similar to @dotancohen's comment) what needs to be done to save jewith life (or land according to the rav 329.6) from any possible threat, and we need to force ourselves even if we do not want to) and not make the mistakes that israel constantly made in having politicians decide military tactics.

ps Rabbi Meir Kahane had some good theories on how to protect jewish life

from history demolition of terrorists' homes seams not to be enough

you question is caused by the modern left view that if a minority wants to hit us (i.e. through rooks that can kill) we should not shoot back, but we should try to appease them (may be not the throwers themselves but their community)

(i am not saying that we should not love a minority, it is just if they want to take something from us we need to protect ourselves) (the world can not exist only with chesed or only with gevura we need a balance)

Judaism respects its old traditions that we only need to appease someone that is stronger then us (in an ideal situation it should Only be G-D all-mighty), but if someone is planing to possibly in the future KILL us we should protect ourselves even by desecrating shabbos (i understand that desecrating shabbos is worse then killing a gentile (because we have a law that we should not save them))

shulchan aruch 329.6

6 If non-Jews attack a Jewish town and have come for the sake of /the residents’/ possessions one may not desecrate the Shabbos because of this. /However,/ if they have come with the object of /taking Jewish/ life, and even if it is not clear /why they have come/, one must go out with weapons and desecrate the Shabbos /in order/ to /resist/ them. If /the attack is/ on a city that is close to the border /,then,/ even if they have come only for the sake of /pillaging/ straw or stubble one must desecrate the Shabbos /in order/ to /resist/ them. Gloss: Even if they have not yet come but intend to come. (…)

the shulchan aruch harav 329.6 end it seam that even if they will not kill us but they only take our land

we need to listen to an expert shulchan aruch harav 328.10

even if we do not want to we need to be forced shulchan aruch harav 328.11

so in these cases it seams that the halocho will be that we need to get professional military (just as by medical) advice (similar to @dotancohen's comment) what needs to be done to save jewith life (or land according to the rav 329.6) from any possible threat, and we need to force ourselves even if we do not want to) and not make the mistakes that israel constantly made in having politicians decide military tactics.

ps Rabbi Meir Kahane had some good theories on how to protect jewish life

from history demolition of terrorists' homes seams not to be enough

6 added 57 characters in body
source | link

you question is caused by the modern left view that if a minority wants to hit us (i.e. through rooks that can kill) we should not shoot back, but we should try to appease them (may be not the throwers themselves but their community)

(i am not saying that we should not love a minority, it is just if they want to take something from us we need to protect ourselves) (the world can not exist only with chesed or only with gevura we need a balance)

Judaism respects its old traditions that we only need to appease someone that is stronger then us (in an ideal situation it should Only be G-D all-mighty), but if someone is planing to possibly in the future KILL us we should protect ourselves even by desecrating shabbos (i understand that desecrating shabbos is worse then killing a goy (because we have a law that we should not save them))

shulchan aruch 329.6

6 If non-Jews attack a Jewish town and have come for the sake of /the residents’/ possessions one may not desecrate the Shabbos because of this. /However,/ if they have come with the object of /taking Jewish/ life, and even if it is not clear /why they have come/, one must go out with weapons and desecrate the Shabbos /in order/ to /resist/ them. If /the attack is/ on a city that is close to the border /,then,/ even if they have come only for the sake of /pillaging/ straw or stubble one must desecrate the Shabbos /in order/ to /resist/ them. Gloss: Even if they have not yet come but intend to come. (…)

the shulchan aruch harav 329.6 end it seam that even if they will not kill us but they only take our land

we need to listen to an expert shulchan aruch harav 328.10

even if we do not want to we need to be forced shulchan aruch harav 328.11

so in these cases it seams that the halocho will be that we need to get professional military (just as by medical) advice (similar to @dotancohen's comment) what needs to be done to save jewith life (or land according to the rav 329.6) from any possible threat, and we need to force ourselves even if we do not want to) and not make the mistakes that israel constantly made in having politicians decide military tactics.

ps Rabbi Meir KahaneRabbi Meir Kahane had some good theories on how to protect jewish life

from history demolition of terrorists' homes seams not to be enough

you question is caused by the modern left view that if a minority wants to hit us (i.e. through rooks that can kill) we should not shoot back, but we should try to appease them (may be not the throwers themselves but their community)

(i am not saying that we should not love a minority, it is just if they want to take something from us we need to protect ourselves) (the world can not exist only with chesed or only with gevura we need a balance)

Judaism respects its old traditions that we only need to appease someone that is stronger then us (in an ideal situation it should Only be G-D all-mighty), but if someone is planing to possibly in the future KILL us we should protect ourselves even by desecrating shabbos (i understand that desecrating shabbos is worse then killing a goy (because we have a law that we should not save them))

shulchan aruch 329.6

6 If non-Jews attack a Jewish town and have come for the sake of /the residents’/ possessions one may not desecrate the Shabbos because of this. /However,/ if they have come with the object of /taking Jewish/ life, and even if it is not clear /why they have come/, one must go out with weapons and desecrate the Shabbos /in order/ to /resist/ them. If /the attack is/ on a city that is close to the border /,then,/ even if they have come only for the sake of /pillaging/ straw or stubble one must desecrate the Shabbos /in order/ to /resist/ them. Gloss: Even if they have not yet come but intend to come. (…)

the shulchan aruch harav 329.6 end it seam that even if they will not kill us but they only take our land

we need to listen to an expert shulchan aruch harav 328.10

even if we do not want to we need to be forced shulchan aruch harav 328.11

so in these cases it seams that the halocho will be that we need to get professional military (just as by medical) advice (similar to @dotancohen's comment) what needs to be done to save jewith life (or land according to the rav 329.6) from any possible threat, and we need to force ourselves even if we do not want to) and not make the mistakes that israel constantly made in having politicians decide military tactics.

ps Rabbi Meir Kahane had some good theories on how to protect jewish life

from history demolition of terrorists' homes seams not to be enough

you question is caused by the modern left view that if a minority wants to hit us (i.e. through rooks that can kill) we should not shoot back, but we should try to appease them (may be not the throwers themselves but their community)

(i am not saying that we should not love a minority, it is just if they want to take something from us we need to protect ourselves) (the world can not exist only with chesed or only with gevura we need a balance)

Judaism respects its old traditions that we only need to appease someone that is stronger then us (in an ideal situation it should Only be G-D all-mighty), but if someone is planing to possibly in the future KILL us we should protect ourselves even by desecrating shabbos (i understand that desecrating shabbos is worse then killing a goy (because we have a law that we should not save them))

shulchan aruch 329.6

6 If non-Jews attack a Jewish town and have come for the sake of /the residents’/ possessions one may not desecrate the Shabbos because of this. /However,/ if they have come with the object of /taking Jewish/ life, and even if it is not clear /why they have come/, one must go out with weapons and desecrate the Shabbos /in order/ to /resist/ them. If /the attack is/ on a city that is close to the border /,then,/ even if they have come only for the sake of /pillaging/ straw or stubble one must desecrate the Shabbos /in order/ to /resist/ them. Gloss: Even if they have not yet come but intend to come. (…)

the shulchan aruch harav 329.6 end it seam that even if they will not kill us but they only take our land

we need to listen to an expert shulchan aruch harav 328.10

even if we do not want to we need to be forced shulchan aruch harav 328.11

so in these cases it seams that the halocho will be that we need to get professional military (just as by medical) advice (similar to @dotancohen's comment) what needs to be done to save jewith life (or land according to the rav 329.6) from any possible threat, and we need to force ourselves even if we do not want to) and not make the mistakes that israel constantly made in having politicians decide military tactics.

ps Rabbi Meir Kahane had some good theories on how to protect jewish life

from history demolition of terrorists' homes seams not to be enough

5 added 81 characters in body
source | link
4 added 397 characters in body
source | link
3 edited body
source | link
2 added 5 characters in body
source | link
1
source | link