2 added 35 characters in body
source | link

David Rosen of Emory University School of Law writes as follows on page 44.

Regarding destruction of homes of living terrorists these actions seem easy to justify under Jewish Law. Ezra 10:8 mentions confiscation of property as a criminal sanction when one disobeys lawful orders. The court, under the biblical commandment, may expropriate property in order to promote the public welfare.

He goes on to say regarding destroying homes of deceased terrorists, that Jewish Law does not punish the dead. This would make it seem impermissible, therefore what is the justification? He says since the family knew of the terrorist activity the dead terrorist was perpetrating , and often helps in various ways, and does not inform the authorities therefore it would be appropriate.

Regarding destruction of homes of living terrorists these actions seem easy to justify under Jewish Law. Ezra 10:8 mentions confiscation of property as a criminal sanction when one disobeys lawful orders. The court, under the biblical commandment, may expropriate property in order to promote the public welfare.

He goes on to say regarding destroying homes of deceased terrorists, that Jewish Law does not punish the dead. This would make it seem impermissible, therefore what is the justification? He says since the family knew of the terrorist activity the dead terrorist was perpetrating , and often helps in various ways, and does not inform the authorities therefore it would be appropriate.

David Rosen of Emory University School of Law writes as follows on page 44.

Regarding destruction of homes of living terrorists these actions seem easy to justify under Jewish Law. Ezra 10:8 mentions confiscation of property as a criminal sanction when one disobeys lawful orders. The court, under the biblical commandment, may expropriate property in order to promote the public welfare.

He goes on to say regarding destroying homes of deceased terrorists, that Jewish Law does not punish the dead. This would make it seem impermissible, therefore what is the justification? He says since the family knew of the terrorist activity the dead terrorist was perpetrating , and often helps in various ways, and does not inform the authorities therefore it would be appropriate.

David Rosen of Emory University School of Law writes as follows on page 44.

Regarding destruction of homes of living terrorists these actions seem easy to justify under Jewish Law. Ezra 10:8 mentions confiscation of property as a criminal sanction when one disobeys lawful orders. The court, under the biblical commandment, may expropriate property in order to promote the public welfare.

He goes on to say regarding destroying homes of deceased terrorists, that Jewish Law does not punish the dead. This would make it seem impermissible, therefore what is the justification? He says since the family knew of the terrorist activity the dead terrorist was perpetrating , and often helps in various ways, and does not inform the authorities therefore it would be appropriate.

1
source | link

David Rosen of Emory University School of Law writes as follows on page 44.

Regarding destruction of homes of living terrorists these actions seem easy to justify under Jewish Law. Ezra 10:8 mentions confiscation of property as a criminal sanction when one disobeys lawful orders. The court, under the biblical commandment, may expropriate property in order to promote the public welfare.

He goes on to say regarding destroying homes of deceased terrorists, that Jewish Law does not punish the dead. This would make it seem impermissible, therefore what is the justification? He says since the family knew of the terrorist activity the dead terrorist was perpetrating , and often helps in various ways, and does not inform the authorities therefore it would be appropriate.