Timeline for Source of the term בכתמים שומעין להקל
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
20 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2015 at 4:01 | answer | added | Dov F | timeline score: 0 | |
| May 7, 2015 at 0:30 | comment | added | wfb | What are the sources for the Rama and the Shach, because I didn't find them | |
| Dec 7, 2014 at 21:12 | answer | added | Y e z | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 13, 2014 at 19:58 | comment | added | Y e z | @user6591 ahh I missed the point of your last words. That is noteworthy. And strange. | |
| Nov 13, 2014 at 19:53 | comment | added | user6591 | The term שומעין להקל used for a דרבנן other than כתמים which would lean towards assuming it is just another way of saying to be מיקל בדרבנן. | |
| Nov 13, 2014 at 19:47 | comment | added | Y e z | @user6591 Sorry, please explain what's specifically of note about that. | |
| Nov 13, 2014 at 16:22 | comment | added | user6591 | Of note. The Noda BiYehuda Yo׳d kamma siman 26 d.h. ומזה נלע׳ד uses the term ובדרבנן שומעים להקל. He is discussing a בב׳ח issue. | |
| Nov 9, 2014 at 20:08 | answer | added | Zvi | timeline score: -1 | |
| Nov 6, 2014 at 4:56 | comment | added | Y e z | @DoubleAA That's fine. I'll check it up but IIRC there is a pretty serious lineup of Rishonim who understood Rebbi Akiva to mean nothing more than safek d'rabannan l'kula, and the rule of שומעין להקל is also pretty widely accepted. | |
| Nov 6, 2014 at 3:49 | comment | added | Double AA♦ | @YeZ It makes it a possibly defensible answer. I'm convinced it is the definitive source. | |
| Nov 6, 2014 at 0:20 | comment | added | Y e z | @DoubleAA So that makes it a possible source assuming that you line up that all of those who use the idea don't have a different interpretation of that Mishna. I don't think that qualifies as "definitive." | |
| Nov 6, 2014 at 0:18 | comment | added | Double AA♦ | @YEZ That doesn't make it not definitively the source. Someone who interprets it differently may not agree to the rule. | |
| Nov 6, 2014 at 0:17 | comment | added | Y e z | @DoubleAA I was more interested in the source of the terminology. But that Mishna is not definitively the source - the Rishonim have different opinions of how to take that point of the Mishna. | |
| Nov 5, 2014 at 23:37 | comment | added | Double AA♦ | Niddah 8:3 is clearly the conceptual source. Are you interested in that or do you want the first instance of this particular formulation? | |
| Nov 5, 2014 at 20:30 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackJudaism/status/530094707800412160 | ||
| Nov 5, 2014 at 20:17 | comment | added | MTL | @msh210 Drop history to do that? | |
| Nov 5, 2014 at 19:51 | comment | added | msh210♦ | Hm, add the provenance or the leniencies tag? | |
| Nov 5, 2014 at 19:43 | history | edited | Y e z | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 91 characters in body
|
| Nov 5, 2014 at 19:41 | history | edited | Scimonster |
edited tags
|
|
| Nov 5, 2014 at 19:36 | history | asked | Y e z | CC BY-SA 3.0 |