Timeline for Why bother with forcing the Get?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2020 at 10:41 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Jul 23, 2014 at 17:45 | history | edited | Y e z | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
revised to respond to comments.
|
| Jul 22, 2014 at 21:49 | comment | added | Y e z | @Yishai The point was to make it into a valid Get with a problem of ratzon, not into a fake Get. The Chachomim would "fix" the Get which is valid in every sense except for his desire to give it. But they would not create a Get from scratch. דוק ותשקח that this is the case in all applications with the exception of תליוה וקידש, in which case the Gemara gives an extenuating logic of הוא עשה שלא כהוגן | |
| Jul 22, 2014 at 20:01 | comment | added | Yishai | I don't see a distinction with the husband "writing" it by being beaten into saying yes and then being locked away so he can't take it back, and just writing it on Beis Din's authority. Seems like a charade - and perhaps that is the intention, but why the charade? | |
| Jul 22, 2014 at 19:56 | history | answered | Y e z | CC BY-SA 3.0 |