Timeline for Are "Halacha To Moses from Sinai" Undisputed?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
12 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2023 at 16:00 | answer | added | Zvi Lampel | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 18, 2022 at 19:16 | comment | added | MichoelR | See my comment below. The idea that there is no dispute on הל"מ is being misunderstood. | |
| Dec 18, 2022 at 17:20 | answer | added | rikitikitembo | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 25, 2015 at 21:22 | comment | added | Shoel U'Meishiv | Robert see the חות יאיר ס' קצ"ב. As well as the מהר"צ חיות in :בבא קמא יז | |
| Apr 25, 2015 at 17:52 | answer | added | Snir Harel | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jul 20, 2014 at 3:09 | answer | added | Y e z | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jul 20, 2014 at 2:07 | answer | added | user6591 | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jul 20, 2014 at 1:56 | comment | added | WAF | Also see Tol'dos Hahalacha, which is cited there. It says that the Ra"sh explicitly stated that the term halacha l'Moshe miSinai, in addition to its usual usage of "very old and non-derived law" can also mean "very obvious and universal" or "undisputed by dint of its rationality". He gives examples. The lecturer could have intended the second category. Also, "undisputed" could simply mean until the time of the G'mara. After all, I can't retroactively nullify this designation by disputing something. | |
| Jul 20, 2014 at 1:48 | comment | added | WAF | Related: judaism.stackexchange.com/q/38766/3 | |
| Jul 20, 2014 at 0:09 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackJudaism/status/490649575171305472 | ||
| Jul 19, 2014 at 21:11 | comment | added | alice fine | amazing question! | |
| Jul 19, 2014 at 20:11 | history | asked | Robert S. Barnes | CC BY-SA 3.0 |