Timeline for Schrödinger's cat and yibbum
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 18, 2023 at 1:14 | answer | added | ElonMusk | timeline score: 1 | |
Apr 23, 2019 at 14:16 | comment | added | Heshy | There's actually a variant of this that might be experimentally achievable. Buckyballs can be used to contain hydrogen. They can be produced in small quantities from candle soot, so it might conceivably be possible to produce them from wood somehow, making them a כלי עץ. And they've been successfully interfered. Just put one of the two paths over a cemetery and you have 1/sqrt(2)(|tamei>+|tahor>) | |
Jun 19, 2014 at 22:04 | answer | added | bondonk | timeline score: 3 | |
Jun 15, 2014 at 13:43 | answer | added | sabbahillel | timeline score: 7 | |
Jun 15, 2014 at 13:27 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackJudaism/status/478167016608919552 | ||
Jun 15, 2014 at 6:26 | comment | added | Double AA♦ | @ShmuelBrin You can always answer a Reductio with אין הכי נמי | |
Jun 15, 2014 at 4:38 | comment | added | MTL | And so what if "Schrödinger did not wish to promote the idea...." -- it's still someone's idea, and is still a legitimate theory! | |
Jun 15, 2014 at 4:36 | comment | added | MTL | @ShmuelBrin See here and here [both linked to in the question btw] | |
Jun 15, 2014 at 4:36 | comment | added | MTL | @ShmuelBrin That is true....but the other side wasn't chozer....since this observer-created reality and and quantum superposition are still real possibilities in physics (and are still taught in physics classrooms!), I was wondering what would happen in this case | |
Jun 15, 2014 at 4:34 | comment | added | ertert3terte | Actually, see Wikipedia article: "Schrödinger did not wish to promote the idea of dead-and-alive cats as a serious possibility; on the contrary, the paradox is a classic reductio ad absurdum" | |
Jun 15, 2014 at 4:33 | comment | added | ertert3terte | I thought Shroedinger's cat was an example of Reductio ad Absurdum. | |
Jun 15, 2014 at 4:21 | comment | added | MTL |
I was gonna name this question something cute, like Schrodinger's yibbum or Schrodinger's nephew but wanted to have a clearer title....think I should change it?
|
|
Jun 15, 2014 at 4:19 | history | asked | MTL | CC BY-SA 3.0 |