Timeline for What's "chelek Eloak mimaal"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2020 at 10:41 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Jun 1, 2014 at 4:27 | comment | added | Y e z | @Yishai Sorry I only meant to imply what I said, which was that implying Hashem exists on a plane to which we can relate is a point of contention between them, to which this interpretation would be essential for the Gra/Nefesh Hachaim and incidental for the Tanya (assuming the tanya were saying the same thing). | |
| May 30, 2014 at 20:44 | comment | added | Yishai | I brought it up because of your last paragraph, which implied that this was a point of contention between them and chassidim. | |
| May 30, 2014 at 20:40 | comment | added | Y e z | @Yishai Tanya is saying something different than Nefesh HaChaim. I wasn't addressing the Tanya, so I don't know why you brought it up, but I was addressing the "simple" implication of the words, which do sound like it is a literal part of Hashem, with which Nefesh HaChaim would be bothered | |
| May 30, 2014 at 13:08 | comment | added | Yishai | There is no difference between what he writes here about this concept and Igeres HaTeshuva (Tanya Part 3) Chapter 4. I don't think either has to do with the question of Tzimtzum KePeshuto or not. | |
| May 30, 2014 at 3:56 | history | answered | Y e z | CC BY-SA 3.0 |