Timeline for Is there a "peshat"-style commentary on Chaim Vital's Etz Chayim?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 6, 2014 at 22:11 | history | edited | msh210♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
remove offensive sarcasm, keeping the point
|
| May 6, 2014 at 22:08 | comment | added | msh210♦ | This answer conflates "p'shat-style commentary" with "commentary for people who don't know more basic material", which is fallacious. | |
| May 6, 2014 at 19:31 | comment | added | preferred | @rabbi ''I'm commenting only since I have spent almost two decades learning and teaching Etz Chaim]'' If thats the case why cant you be helpful and give us your opinion of what pirush to use. Or have you managed these two decades without one | |
| May 5, 2014 at 17:24 | review | Low quality posts | |||
| May 6, 2014 at 22:11 | |||||
| May 5, 2014 at 16:49 | comment | added | preferred | Another one is 'otsros chaim hamvuor' by Y Schischa. If you get stuck come back on here for help! | |
| May 5, 2014 at 16:47 | comment | added | preferred | There are many such seforim. Ones I possess include kerem shlomo by R Salaman Eliyahu. in many volumes but he only covers half of it. | |
| May 5, 2014 at 16:20 | comment | added | Double AA♦ | E=mc^2 only for a non-moving object. Really E^2 = (pc)^2 + (mc^2)^2 and the proof is pretty short. | |
| May 5, 2014 at 16:16 | comment | added | Yitzchak | As you can see above, there is such a book. | |
| May 5, 2014 at 15:05 | history | answered | rabbi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |