Skip to main content
20 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 9 at 14:34 answer added Yoel Steinberg timeline score: 0
Oct 17, 2018 at 16:31 answer added YM69 timeline score: 0
Feb 9, 2015 at 19:45 comment added MTL Related: coffee.stackexchange.com/q/139/267
May 4, 2014 at 4:47 history edited msh210 CC BY-SA 3.0
I think WP detects a mobile HTTP request and adds the "m." -- but doesn't remove it for a non-mobile user.
May 4, 2014 at 3:22 comment added Seth J @yoni so if I'm going through caffeine withdrawal (Holeh SheEin Bo Sakanah) I can use it?
May 2, 2014 at 17:49 comment added Yoni @Tatpurusha I laugh when I think of the question "who was brave enough to eat the first egg?" From ish ploni vekohen it seems the coffee is amazing...besides it's civet enhanced coffee...marketing is everything ;-)
May 2, 2014 at 17:39 comment added Tatpurusha @Yoni I'm starting to think I should end all my comments with "Maybe???" in order to get across the tone that I intend. It's obvious that honey is qualitatively different from yak vomit, but civet poop is just poop, and then they take out the coffee beans? Maybe???
May 2, 2014 at 15:34 comment added Yoni @Tatpurusha yet the Gemara (Bechoros) dicusses donkey urine. And vomit is assur (Yoreh Deah 166,6) yet bee honey which is bee vomit (see Rambam Perush Hamishna Bechoros) is mutar! Also, even disgusting things may be mutar for medicial purposes for a choleh she'ain bo sakana, unless they are assur min hatorah
May 2, 2014 at 15:33 answer added Ish Ploni ViKohen timeline score: 11
May 2, 2014 at 5:56 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackJudaism/status/462108369793597440
May 2, 2014 at 3:08 comment added Gary I don't care HOW good it tastes, if it comes out of another mammal's pupik I'm not consuming it...
May 1, 2014 at 18:41 comment added Gershon Gold din.org.il/2011/07/17/…
May 1, 2014 at 17:42 comment added Tatpurusha Tractate Makkos says you are not permitted to eat feces under the prohibition of "do not make yourself disgusting."
May 1, 2014 at 16:44 comment added Isaac Moses @GershonGold The civet ingredient that seems to be referring to is a pheremone extracted from the civet animal mentioned in the question. It's quite possible that coffee beans that have passed through the latter do not have the same status as the former, just as honey, which we take to be a product that has passed through a bee, does not have the same status as the bee itself or any part thereof.
May 1, 2014 at 16:27 history edited Yoni CC BY-SA 3.0
added 31 characters in body
May 1, 2014 at 15:28 comment added Yoni There is no doubt that civet is not a kosher animal and any direct derivatives of a nonkosher animal is also not kosher. Hoyotzei min hatamei tamei (bechoros 7). The issue here is whether the digestion of coffee is considered as yotzei or not. The gemara ibid deals with a question of donkey urine and considers that pirsha is mutar. But questions whether urine is pirsha.
May 1, 2014 at 14:28 comment added Gershon Gold Star-K in a discussion on falvorings says the following. So, civet (from the cat family) or oleic acid (from beef tallow) may not be batel. This would indicate that it is not Kosher.
May 1, 2014 at 14:17 comment added Double AA Bechoros 7a
May 1, 2014 at 14:13 history edited Isaac Moses
edited tags
May 1, 2014 at 12:36 history asked Yoni CC BY-SA 3.0