Skip to main content
7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 6, 2014 at 18:32 comment added Zachariah fwiw, you will find reproducibility if you continue reading. The techniques that the Global Consciousness Project used have further their own scientific aims as well as reinforcing PEAR's. So I could not harmonize with your assertion of basic flaws. Nor can I cannot speak for 'parapsychological desires', but I think that further good science can be done by new efforts like these.
Feb 6, 2014 at 17:24 comment added Ephraim PEAR's results, assuming them to be true, are extremely underwhelming- at least for those who believe in parapsychology. It's equivalent to proving that a person can use his mind to move a grain a sand a thousandth of a millimeter. In any case, PEAR's research had flaws, and was not shown reproducible by other who replicated the experiments.
Feb 6, 2014 at 14:41 comment added Zachariah We should remember, too, that as much as it is well to be conservative by-principle, we must also remember that research and Science advances what we know. Creation is a mystery to be explored. Some would consider the PEAR research controversial by common thinking, but 30 yrs of science still holds against critique. Yet, were someone to ask me about making a life-changing decision upon this research, I would have to know their life and situation very well to answer in any other way but conservatively! (and let me not seem in suggestion of avodah zarah)
Feb 5, 2014 at 19:12 history edited Ephraim CC BY-SA 3.0
Fixed typo
Feb 2, 2014 at 13:39 history edited Ephraim CC BY-SA 3.0
added 1 characters in body
Feb 2, 2014 at 13:29 vote accept DaagahMinayin
Feb 2, 2014 at 9:25 history answered Ephraim CC BY-SA 3.0