Timeline for Is it permissible to exclusively wear tephilin according to Rabenu Tam?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2013 at 1:33 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackJudaism/status/411670144042409984 | ||
| Dec 11, 2013 at 9:04 | answer | added | Danny Schoemann | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 10, 2013 at 15:20 | comment | added | user3342 | Why the downvoting? | |
| Dec 10, 2013 at 15:20 | comment | added | user3342 | @DoubleAA - I guess my question was motivated by the fact that I have asked this question of several Rabanim and have been told "no." But upon reading the history of the mahloqeth, I see that RT was the dominant shitta. So, I wondered if anyone here on Mi Yodeya might have some insight. My apologies for being unclear. I am not sure why the questioned is being contested so hard. But I am open to correction regarding it. Kol tuv. | |
| Dec 10, 2013 at 14:39 | comment | added | Double AA♦ | @sam RT full shittah also includes an extra vav in the fourth parsha. | |
| Dec 10, 2013 at 5:50 | comment | added | Double AA♦ | I said posek, not the average Jew, yeshiva bahur, or Rav | |
| Dec 10, 2013 at 5:31 | comment | added | sam | RT full shittah(klaf laying down) is not RT of today,which one are you referring to | |
| Dec 10, 2013 at 5:29 | comment | added | user3342 | @DoubleAA - Have you asked the average Jew, yeshiva bahur, Rav, et al. lately? The emphatic assertion - and some would say "battle cry" - would be "Shulhan Arukh!" And to even ask this question would be to betray one's stupidity and ignorance of the "obvious halakha." Just speaking from experience. Kol tuv. | |
| Dec 10, 2013 at 5:15 | comment | added | Double AA♦ | @Maimonist I don't really follow why those would be true. | |
| Dec 10, 2013 at 5:04 | history | edited | msh210♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 158 characters in body
|
| Dec 10, 2013 at 3:48 | comment | added | user3342 | @DoubleAA - Well, I guess my assumptions are that A) since Rash"i is "in" at this time, and since that designation would make RT tephilin "pasul," it would follow that one would not be able to, and B) that since "everyone knows" that Rash"i tephilin are "correct" halakhically then a poseq would be "unable" to posken like RT - at least l'ma`aseh. Kol tuv. | |
| Dec 10, 2013 at 2:34 | comment | added | Double AA♦ | I don't understand the question. Are you asking if a posek can choose to paskin like RT? Why would anyone think he couldn't? | |
| Dec 10, 2013 at 2:01 | comment | added | ertert3terte | When did the Machlokes start and when did it end? | |
| Dec 10, 2013 at 1:15 | history | asked | user3342 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |