Timeline for Not speaking between Shemoneh Esrei and Hallel
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2021 at 15:53 | comment | added | chortkov2 | @Yoni - See also Or Sameach intro to Hilchos Tefilla who reads the Tosefta this way | |
| May 7, 2014 at 16:26 | comment | added | Yoni | See Igros Moshe (OC, 3:70), Chazon Yehezkel (Tosefta ibid), Mikraei Kodesh (Sukkos 2:22) that Tosefta is referring to the 3 parts of Shmoneh Esrai. | |
| Dec 8, 2013 at 22:53 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| Dec 2, 2013 at 18:53 | history | edited | Gershon Gold | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 126 characters in body
|
| Dec 2, 2013 at 18:51 | comment | added | msh210♦ | Can you edit your answer, please, to clarify whether the Maharsham says not to interrupt between t'fila and halel, or merely that they're m'akev one another? | |
| Dec 2, 2013 at 18:45 | comment | added | Double AA♦ | Hmmmm it seems he just ignores that word. Not impressed, especially because שבח is attested to in old manuscripts of the Tosefta. He even says he hasn't looked at any commentaries on the Tosefta. | |
| Dec 2, 2013 at 18:30 | comment | added | Double AA♦ | I haven't read the responsum inside yet, but that sounds like a really novel read of the Tosefta. How does he explain the word שבח in the Tosefta? 6:6 | |
| Dec 2, 2013 at 18:17 | history | answered | Gershon Gold | CC BY-SA 3.0 |