Skip to main content
25 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Oct 16, 2016 at 16:31 history edited mevaqesh
edited tags
Oct 16, 2016 at 16:30 comment added mevaqesh I am removing tags that refer to incidental items in the question, which the question is not about.
Jan 6, 2015 at 1:39 answer added Joseph timeline score: -2
Jan 5, 2015 at 5:59 comment added הנער הזה judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/6103/is-rashi-really-pshat
Jan 5, 2015 at 5:51 history edited Seth J CC BY-SA 3.0
Striking the distracting line that is part of my thought process but not the core question.
Jan 4, 2015 at 14:41 comment added הנער הזה Despite Rashi's own comments in this regard, it probably isn't true that his only motivation for citing midrashim is in order to answer a question in peshat. See vbm-torah.org/archive/parshanut/05parshanut.htm and subsequent articles in that series
Dec 10, 2014 at 22:15 answer added fromwhereveritcomes timeline score: 4
Jul 14, 2013 at 3:11 history edited Menachem CC BY-SA 3.0
linked using HodofHod's script: http://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/9434/
Jul 14, 2013 at 2:03 answer added Menachem timeline score: 1
Jul 13, 2013 at 20:03 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackJudaism/status/356141835141386241
Jul 12, 2013 at 21:05 answer added josh waxman timeline score: 2
Jul 12, 2013 at 20:24 history edited Seth J CC BY-SA 3.0
added 125 characters in body; edited title
Jul 12, 2013 at 20:19 comment added Seth J @IsaacMoses, yeah, I couldn't help wondering what Bonchek would say (although, not by name; I didn't know his name until now).
Jul 12, 2013 at 20:18 history edited Seth J CC BY-SA 3.0
added 125 characters in body; edited title
Jul 12, 2013 at 20:13 comment added Isaac Moses @SethJ, Socratic comments FTW! I wonder if Dr. Avigdor Bonchek or R' josh waxman have something to say about it.
Jul 12, 2013 at 20:12 history edited Seth J CC BY-SA 3.0
added 125 characters in body; edited title
Jul 12, 2013 at 20:10 comment added Seth J @IsaacMoses, I just looked at Rashi now (I knew that it was cited by him, but I wasn't looking at it at the moment that I made my comment). He does definitely cite the Midrash - after giving my Peshat. This might make the new version of the question the better one.
Jul 12, 2013 at 20:08 comment added Seth J @IsaacMoses, fair enough; should I reword it, "why does Rashi feel the need to cite the Midrash?"
Jul 12, 2013 at 20:05 comment added Seth J @msh210, regarding וַתִּקָּחֶהָ, I didn't say there's anything wrong, just that the Pasuk eliminates an awkward word (that it made awkward by assuming it's her arm), but left this word seeming ... less natural.
Jul 12, 2013 at 20:04 comment added Isaac Moses @SethJ, really? I've certainly heard that assumption about Rashi in his choice to quote a midrash, but I thought the point of midrash was was transmit traditional lessons and narratives that are associated with the verses.
Jul 12, 2013 at 20:02 comment added Seth J @IsaacMoses, of course it isn't giving us Peshat. But my assumption is that - usually - where Midrash comes in is when Peshat is inadequate and calls for Derash to explain it.
Jul 12, 2013 at 19:05 history edited msh210
edited tags
Jul 12, 2013 at 19:04 comment added msh210 I don't see anything wrong with "וַתִּקָּחֶהָ" if the pasuk is read as referring to an arm; nor do I understand why you think "וַתִּשְׁלַח" makes more sense for an arm than for a servant.
Jul 12, 2013 at 18:57 comment added Isaac Moses Are you assuming that the Midrash is attempting to give peshat in the pasuk and not, say, to make some homiletic point or transmit a tradition regarding what happened?
Jul 12, 2013 at 18:49 history asked Seth J CC BY-SA 3.0