Timeline for Confessing to Adultery
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Mar 13, 2019 at 0:26 | history | suggested | alicht | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added links to sources cited
|
| Mar 12, 2019 at 20:29 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Mar 13, 2019 at 0:26 | |||||
| Mar 12, 2019 at 19:52 | history | edited | Monica Cellio | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added info from comment, h/t Shimon bM
|
| Jun 4, 2013 at 7:07 | history | edited | ray | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 4 characters in body
|
| May 30, 2013 at 13:39 | vote | accept | Shimon bM | ||
| May 30, 2013 at 13:39 | comment | added | Shimon bM | For the benefit of others, the statement that @DoubleAA just shared is from Yevamot 25b, and concerns a person's disqualify himself from testimony. Interestingly, the explicit formulation that we do not execute a person on his own testimony appears not to have been stated in so many words until the Rambam, Hilkhot Sanhedrin 18:6. There are, however, similar rulings, and ones from which it might be derived (such as the fact that we don't include a person's testimony with a single witness in order to make two; Tosefta Shevuot 5:3). | |
| May 30, 2013 at 12:48 | comment | added | Double AA♦ | @ShimonbM אין אדם משים עצמו רשע | |
| May 30, 2013 at 12:45 | comment | added | Shimon bM | That makes sense... although it does seem counter-intuitive. Do you have a source for the idea that a person cannot testify against herself? Or that you cannot execute somebody whose admission precedes testimony against them? | |
| May 30, 2013 at 7:58 | history | answered | ray | CC BY-SA 3.0 |