Timeline for What is so special about being part of the 613 mitzvos?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
21 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2022 at 19:23 | comment | added | Chaim | Are there any other answers, as לע"ד the question hasn't been answered (except for the kabbalistic approach). i.e. the Q stated that there are biblical requirements outside of the bilbical requirements labelled "613 mitzvos" - if so - what's the inherent practical difference between the two? | |
| Jul 19, 2020 at 16:57 | history | edited | robev | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| May 25, 2020 at 13:11 | answer | added | MichoelR | timeline score: 0 | |
| Feb 13, 2014 at 11:39 | answer | added | ray | timeline score: 3 | |
| Nov 22, 2013 at 2:44 | comment | added | paquda | It's very weird that halakhic authorities put such importance on making things work out so that there are 613 when the source of that number is a piece of agaddeta. | |
| Nov 20, 2013 at 21:08 | answer | added | user4523 | timeline score: 9 | |
| Apr 21, 2013 at 5:05 | history | edited | msh210♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
English
|
| Apr 21, 2013 at 3:09 | comment | added | Tamir Evan | @shlomo I don't know about others, but it seems to me that the Rambam did not recognize anything outside his count of Mitsvot being a Mitzvah de-Oraita, even if it is mentioned in the Torah shebi-Khtav, but instead would see it as part of listed Mitzvot, or as one of of their specific Halakhot. See, in his introduction to Sefer ha-Mitzvot, Klal 7 and klal 11. | |
| Apr 21, 2013 at 2:16 | comment | added | Tamir Evan | @DoubleAA In my comment here, I'm not aware that I was using any category. When you brought your example for what shlomo was talking about, you used the term "biblical requirement" for it, whereas he was using "mitzva Doraita". Considering the different term you used, I was asking if you two were really talking about the same thing. | |
| Apr 21, 2013 at 1:18 | comment | added | shlomo | dioraita in torah where there is argument if its part of 613 | |
| Apr 21, 2013 at 0:51 | comment | added | Double AA♦ | @TamirEvan I don't understand what the category of Mitzva that you are using is. | |
| Apr 20, 2013 at 18:46 | comment | added | Tamir Evan | @DoubleAA So it's a biblical requirement, but is it a Mitzvah? shlomo seems to be claiming that there are biblical Mitzvot that aren't part of the 613. | |
| Apr 20, 2013 at 10:55 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackJudaism/status/325563427131109376 | ||
| Apr 19, 2013 at 22:40 | comment | added | Double AA♦ | @CharlesKoppelman For instance, dipping metal food utensils bought from non-Jews is considered by many (most?) to be a biblical requirement. However, most (all?) do not list this in their list of the 613. | |
| Apr 19, 2013 at 19:50 | comment | added | Charles Koppelman | @shlomo I'm confused how a mitvah can be d'oraita and not one of the 613 d'oraita mitzvot. Can you say specifically what you're talking about before asking for a general case? | |
| Apr 19, 2013 at 18:48 | comment | added | shlomo | Really, I really dont know i just heard that it was a mitzva Doraita. | |
| Apr 19, 2013 at 18:40 | comment | added | Hacham Gabriel | How can we say it's a Miswa if it's not in the 613? Then it's a Derabanan. | |
| Apr 19, 2013 at 18:40 | comment | added | shlomo | Im talking about when both mitzvas are in the Torah, and one is part of the "613" and the other is just a mitzva. | |
| Apr 19, 2013 at 18:38 | comment | added | Hacham Gabriel | One of example of a practical differnce if it's part of the 613 or not. By something from the Torah (one of the 613) we say if you are in doubt you must be stringent but by Derabanan you would be lenient. | |
| Apr 19, 2013 at 18:37 | history | edited | Hacham Gabriel | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 characters in body
|
| Apr 19, 2013 at 18:17 | history | asked | shlomo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |