Timeline for What is "blood that moved from one place to another"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 25, 2012 at 22:46 | history | edited | Menachem | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
arteries
|
| Dec 25, 2012 at 19:36 | vote | accept | Shaul Behr | ||
| Dec 25, 2012 at 19:36 | comment | added | Shaul Behr | For the record, the Rosh defines "blood that moved" specifically as having left the meat altogether; he seems to be your primary source for your paragraph beginning "There are opinions..." | |
| Dec 25, 2012 at 19:01 | comment | added | Menachem | @DoubleAA: The term the Tur uses is 'the strings that have blood in them, since the blood in the strings are as if gathered and standing in a vessel'. If I had to guess, I'd say that all the tubes (veins, arteries) that are still recognizable as such are forbidden, but ones that do not have recognizable tubes are permitted. According to wikipedia en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capillary the walls of the capillaries are just one cell thick. Hardly recognizable as tubes. | |
| Dec 25, 2012 at 18:51 | comment | added | Double AA♦ | Since the question is specifically about science, I'm going to press you further. What do you mean veins? Is that to exclude arteries? If so, why? If not, then wouldn't all capillaries fit in as well? Blood is always in a vein, artery or capillarity (when not inside the heart/lungs/liver/kidney). What does 'in the meat' mean scientifically? | |
| Dec 25, 2012 at 18:47 | history | edited | Menachem | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
changed to veins
|
| Dec 25, 2012 at 18:43 | comment | added | Double AA♦ | Per science, blood is always in the circulatory system, just in narrow and narrower tubes. | |
| Dec 25, 2012 at 18:08 | history | answered | Menachem | CC BY-SA 3.0 |