Notice removed Canonical answer required by Community
    Bounty Ended with user6591's answer chosen by Community
    Notice added Canonical answer required by msh210
    Bounty Started worth 150 reputation by msh210
    Tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackJudaism/status/221689063399366656
4 Put the question into the question, not just in the title.
source | link

I know the why, and I see that's been asked/answered here many times. But I was curious about the proper mechanics of itthe 3 steps back (forward) before/after Amidah.

I've always started with my feet together, taken 1 step back with my left leg, then taken my second step by moving my right leg past where my left leg is, then the third step is bringing my left leg back to be even with my right. (Then invert that to go forward.)

But I've seen others do 3 full steps — left leg back, then right to be equal, that's 1. Then again, and again.

Is there a "right" way?

I know the why, and I see that's been asked/answered here many times. But I was curious about the proper mechanics of it.

I've always started with my feet together, taken 1 step back with my left leg, then taken my second step by moving my right leg past where my left leg is, then the third step is bringing my left leg back to be even with my right. (Then invert that to go forward.)

But I've seen others do 3 full steps — left leg back, then right to be equal, that's 1. Then again, and again.

Is there a "right" way?

I know the why, and I see that's been asked/answered here many times. But I was curious about the proper mechanics of the 3 steps back (forward) before/after Amidah.

I've always started with my feet together, taken 1 step back with my left leg, then taken my second step by moving my right leg past where my left leg is, then the third step is bringing my left leg back to be even with my right. (Then invert that to go forward.)

But I've seen others do 3 full steps — left leg back, then right to be equal, that's 1. Then again, and again.

Is there a "right" way?

3 edited tags
| link
2 neaten
source | link

I know the why, and I see that's been asked/answered here many times. But I was curiuoscurious about the proper mechanics of it.

I've always started with my feet together, taken 1 step back with my left leg, then taken my second step by moving my right leg past whenrewhere my left leg is, then the thridthird step is bringlingbringing my left leg back to be even with my right. (thenThen invert that to go forward).)

But I've seen others do 3 full steps - left leg back, then right to be equeal -equal, that's 1. Then again, and again.

Is there a "right" way?

I know the why, and I see that's been asked/answered here many times. But I was curiuos about the proper mechanics of it.

I've always started with my feet together, taken 1 step back with my left leg, then taken my second step by moving my right leg past whenre my left leg is, then the thrid step is bringling my left leg back to be even with my right (then invert that to go forward).

But I've seen others do 3 full steps - left leg back, then right to be equeal - that's 1. Then again, and again.

Is there a "right" way?

I know the why, and I see that's been asked/answered here many times. But I was curious about the proper mechanics of it.

I've always started with my feet together, taken 1 step back with my left leg, then taken my second step by moving my right leg past where my left leg is, then the third step is bringing my left leg back to be even with my right. (Then invert that to go forward.)

But I've seen others do 3 full steps left leg back, then right to be equal, that's 1. Then again, and again.

Is there a "right" way?

1
source | link