Skip to main content
17 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 5, 2021 at 7:05 history edited Dov
edited tags
Jul 15, 2017 at 7:40 answer added Pau timeline score: -1
Sep 15, 2013 at 5:02 answer added Seth J timeline score: 1
Sep 15, 2013 at 4:45 comment added Albert Cheng I do not think so. there isn't any similarity between Hebrew and Chinese
Jul 10, 2013 at 16:04 comment added msh210 Similar: judaism.stackexchange.com/q/29851.
Apr 6, 2012 at 15:04 history edited HodofHod CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 43 characters in body
Apr 3, 2012 at 11:34 history edited Maxood CC BY-SA 3.0
added 71 characters in body
Mar 26, 2012 at 8:38 history tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackJudaism/status/184197637900218368
Mar 26, 2012 at 5:33 answer added Curiouser timeline score: 7
Mar 26, 2012 at 4:49 answer added josh waxman timeline score: 6
Mar 25, 2012 at 21:07 comment added Seth J Aramaic is very similar to both. I personally think of it as almost a bridge between the two, semantically, if not developmentally.
Mar 25, 2012 at 20:27 answer added Eytan Yammer timeline score: 11
Mar 25, 2012 at 20:19 comment added Yaakov Kuperman If this question is about whether Hebrew or Arabic is the 'root of all languages', the question is based on a false premise. Assuming that there is a common root to all languages (I don't believe that this is backed by any serious linguistic scholars), and that the narrative sections of the bible are meant literally, both of those languages have further ancestry in the semitic language family. Cf. this article. If, however, this question is about how the literalist sources would view this matter, then it should be revised to say so.
Mar 25, 2012 at 19:16 comment added msh210 Closely related: judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/9036.
Mar 25, 2012 at 18:59 comment added Hacham Gabriel I know someone that is working on a book on this topic (or at least something very similar).
Mar 25, 2012 at 18:12 history edited Double AA CC BY-SA 3.0
tags; edited tags
Mar 25, 2012 at 18:10 history asked Maxood CC BY-SA 3.0