Timeline for When to assume someone’s a liar
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7 at 0:32 | comment | added | Curious Yid | @shmosel i edited | |
| Nov 7 at 0:32 | history | edited | Curious Yid | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 275 characters in body
|
| Nov 7 at 0:30 | comment | added | Curious Yid | But what about geneivat daat, or מסייע לעוברי עברה | |
| Nov 6 at 23:51 | comment | added | Maurice Mizrahi | You can't assume guilt, unless you have proof. If you strongly suspect guilt, you are free to refuse to be an accessory, even if it costs you your job. But you don't have to. | |
| Nov 6 at 23:25 | comment | added | Y DJ | Writing a report like the OP describes, may not be the official statement. It is corporate practice that reports are made in the name of a group, not a single analyst. The "boss" may have numbers that s/he can substitute into the report when sending it up the chain. | |
| Nov 6 at 22:51 | comment | added | shmosel | Where's the halachic angle? | |
| Nov 6 at 22:27 | history | asked | Curious Yid | CC BY-SA 4.0 |