Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 4, 2020 at 14:00 comment added Double AA Without you describing and defending a particular conceptualization of bittul torah this answer isn't helpful. Clearly the questioner knew that bittul torah was at play here but didn't understand why it would have this effect. You need to explain it, not just say "Bittul Torah is bad" when everyone knew that.
Jun 4, 2020 at 13:56 history edited Dani CC BY-SA 4.0
added 81 characters in body
Jun 4, 2020 at 13:54 comment added Dani See these questions for laws of bittul Torah. judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/37765/…, judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/30840/…
Jun 4, 2020 at 13:53 comment added Double AA Why though is it more מבטל תורה to stop learning than to never have been learning? Surely the latter is less time spent learning total.
Jun 4, 2020 at 13:52 comment added Double AA I tend to agree, and that was apparent in the story. It doesn't support what you wrote though.
Jun 4, 2020 at 13:51 comment added Dani The reason he is considered mortally guilty is because he stopped learning. If he wasn't learning previously, he would be fine.
Jun 4, 2020 at 13:49 comment added Double AA Why do you describe not learning Torah to deal with a different mitzva of ahavat and yirat hashem as bittul torah? Is it bittul torah to shake a lulav?
Jun 4, 2020 at 13:47 comment added Double AA What does the Bartenura add here that you quote him?
Jun 4, 2020 at 13:47 comment added Double AA So the Rambam's encouragement of studying nature is only for people who don't know how to study Torah? Seems counterintuitive as the Rambam himself seems to have studied nature and Torah.
Jun 4, 2020 at 13:42 history answered Dani CC BY-SA 4.0