Timeline for Why is there no makaf between “Ben” and “Yair”?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
19 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2020 at 10:41 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Mar 9, 2020 at 14:00 | comment | added | sam | That's a gemara I believe as well,but in reality he was a son on Yair,the question is why mention everyone else who aren't literal grandfathers | |
| Mar 9, 2020 at 10:32 | comment | added | Kazi bácsi | @sam Here they only seem to suggest symbolic meaning: sefaria.org.il/… | |
| Mar 8, 2020 at 15:36 | comment | added | sam | Meaning a true ben no makaf, not true son has makaf | |
| Mar 8, 2020 at 15:34 | comment | added | sam | It might have something to do with the fact that Moredicha was the son of Yair but Yair was not the son of Shmi... | |
| Mar 8, 2020 at 12:07 | comment | added | Double AA♦ | (incidentally in rare cases there can be a merkha between a darga and a tvir he.m.wikisource.org/wiki/… but that wouldn't apply here) | |
| Mar 8, 2020 at 12:00 | comment | added | Double AA♦ | @interested the second Ben would get a merkha (like any small word before tvir) and the darga would become a kadma. If there were no makafs we could fill in the neginos without a problem. They'd be different, surely, but they could have the same grammatical pauses. So what? | |
| Mar 8, 2020 at 11:02 | comment | added | interested | @DoubleAA what negina would you then choose for the second one and the word after it, remember after a dargo there has to be a tvir, so shimi would be 'lost' | |
| Mar 8, 2020 at 6:59 | comment | added | Kazi bácsi | If I said that there are 7 exceptions to the rule, and this is one of them, would you accept it as an answer? | |
| Mar 8, 2020 at 2:27 | comment | added | Double AA♦ | Why does the second one must have? @interested you're still just describing not explaining | |
| Mar 8, 2020 at 2:19 | comment | added | interested | @DoubleAA Look at it the other way round. Why must they have a makaf. Because they must. Whereas the first doesnt need one so it can have a negina. At least the second one must have, so also the third has but the first doesnt need to have. | |
| Mar 8, 2020 at 0:59 | comment | added | Double AA♦ | @interested that's not an answer, but a description. Why is there a negina and not a makaf? | |
| Mar 7, 2020 at 21:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackJudaism/status/1236396382317051906 | ||
| Mar 7, 2020 at 19:34 | comment | added | interested | The simple answer is because there is a n'gina under it. A 'dargo' always comes with one before it. | |
| Mar 7, 2020 at 19:11 | comment | added | Kazi bácsi | I dared to edit your transliteration, please roll back if you don't like it. | |
| Mar 7, 2020 at 19:11 | history | edited | Kazi bácsi | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited title
|
| Mar 7, 2020 at 18:50 | history | edited | Kazi bácsi | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 5 characters in body
|
| Mar 6, 2020 at 22:02 | history | edited | Yaakov Pinchas | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 10 characters in body
|
| Mar 6, 2020 at 21:57 | history | asked | Yaakov Pinchas | CC BY-SA 4.0 |