Timeline for Doesn't prat u'klal mean that there are unnecessary words in torah?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2011 at 1:39 | vote | accept | Monica Cellio | ||
| Oct 27, 2011 at 15:47 | comment | added | Alex | @Monica: as far as I know, yes. The difference between this and rule #7 is that in cases like this one, the k'lal is pretty well understood on its own, and the p'rat comes to add details; whereas in rule #7 the k'lal is meaningless without the p'rat. | |
| Oct 27, 2011 at 14:25 | comment | added | Monica Cellio | Thank you. I understand you to be saying that the specific cases always bring something to the interpretation, as you illustrated with this case. Correct? That is, this example is not special somehow? | |
| Oct 27, 2011 at 7:08 | comment | added | Menachem | Rabbi Yossi Jacobson has a lecture based on the Sicha mentioned in the answer here: theyeshiva.net/Video/View/38 | |
| Oct 27, 2011 at 3:52 | history | edited | Alex | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 581 characters in body
|
| Oct 27, 2011 at 3:04 | history | answered | Alex | CC BY-SA 3.0 |