19,035 reputation
3289
bio website
location
age
visits member for 3 years, 6 months
seen Aug 29 at 20:45

.ויהי בארבעה ועשרים שנה ואני בתוך הגולה על נהר הדסן


May
22
comment Talis Gadol for Unmarried Individuals
"Extracting instructive meaning from the juxtaposition of two verses" is only acceptable as a method of rabbinic midrash halacha. Never before have I heard of such a method being used to provide for "giving rise to a minhag", especially one that counters the general idea of one being obligated in mitzvos from bar mitzva age.
May
22
comment Will I ever actually make “al mitzvat tzitzit” on a daily basis if I don a tallit gadol?
For those wondering, I am yekke (of German descent), not sefardi.
May
22
comment Talis Gadol for Unmarried Individuals
I have heard that this originated in Europe as an incentive for young men to get married. No source, though.
May
22
asked Blessing the Children on Friday Night
May
22
comment Will I ever actually make “al mitzvat tzitzit” on a daily basis if I don a tallit gadol?
I know that the halacha is that one who dons a talit gadol for shacharit every morning does not make a b'racha on donning his talit katan. (If I have a chance to look up the sources later, I will post an answer if no one else has.) Personally, I have not made the b'racha al mitzvat tzitzit since I became bar mitzva and starting wearing a talit gadol.
May
22
comment Is there a purchasable copy of the Shulchan Aruch in Hebrew and English?
You might be interested, though, in the many contemporary English books available on pretty much any halachic subject. They usually consist of a summary of the applicable halachos, with useful footnotes telling of the sources in classic sources in shulchan aruch, its commentators, responsa, and contemorary poskim.
May
22
comment Is there a purchasable copy of the Shulchan Aruch in Hebrew and English?
Just realized how weird it is that English versions have been made of all types of halachic works, like Mishna Torah, Sefer HaChinuch, Mishna Berura, (not to mention Talmud Bavli,) but I can't think of a single English version of the Shulchan Aruch.
May
22
awarded  Critic
May
22
comment Reconciling Nature with Continuous Creation
I must admit I find this fascinating, and at least at first glance, it seems plausible as an explanation for this idea. Though, one must be comfortable with explaining ma'amarei chazal with contemporary science. Do you perhaps have a source in which someone explains "המחדש בכל יום תמיד מעשה בראשית", in accordance with this idea?
May
22
comment What happened to the Jewish practice of using burial caves?
@JXG, @AaronShaffier, Thanks for the sources.
May
22
comment Reconciling Nature with Continuous Creation
I'm not sure I understand your answer. I acknowledge the fact that God must exist for the universe's existence to continue, as the existence of the creation depends on the the creator. However, in my mind, God's continuous existence is not the same as His continuously renewing creation. For example, if I hold a cup in the air at shoulder-height, then the cup's being in the air depends on my continuing to hold it up. But, my continuing to hold the cup is not the same as continuously lifting it up off the table.
May
22
comment What happened to the Jewish practice of using burial caves?
Do you have sources or examples for your assumed information?
May
20
revised History of Birkas haMinim
added 17 characters in body; added 1 characters in body
May
20
comment Reconciling Nature with Continuous Creation
Thanks for clarifying. Although (a) doesn't convince me, (b) indeed does imply that this is his intention. A constant yesh me'ayin. Even if I did understand this concept fully, which I don't, it still is somewhat of a contradiction to the idea of teva, that there is a universal nature. Although this explanation of RSZ fits with מחדש בכל יום תמיד, the question is still intact. It still needs a reconciliation with the natural order.
May
20
answered History of Birkas haMinim
May
19
revised Identification of Rishon
added 1 characters in body
May
19
comment Identification of Rishon
According to the footnote in the link, it's the same person as הר"ד דיילקרויישא מאורליינש.
May
19
answered Identification of Rishon
May
19
comment Reconciling Nature with Continuous Creation
... Rather he is מהוה them constantly, which means a constant "continuation of existence", or yesh mi'yesh if you will. They do not continue to exist independently, but rather, continue to exist with God's assistance. In the previous chapter that you referred me to, he talks about the "Ten utterances" and says שיש בהם כח וחיות לברוא יש מאין ולהחיותו לעולם, that is, the power to create them once and then to keep them existing indefinitely. This is different from מחדש בכל יום תמיד, which implies a constant yesh me'ayin.
May
19
comment Reconciling Nature with Continuous Creation
I think you misunderstood me. I was not implying that everything was created just once and continues to exist independently. Rather, I meant that the implication of the Tanya is that God created everything once and then continues to allow them to exist, for if he did not, they would cease to exist. He is not "constantly bringing them into existence", for this would imply constant yesh me'ayin...