13,276 reputation
21863
bio website
location
age
visits member for 4 years, 8 months
seen 18 hours ago

Feb
6
comment Moshe's name is missing
Kudos for pointing out that Moshe is mentioned in the first word of the parasha.
Feb
6
comment Yosef Mokir Shabbos
What is the question? It would probably be helpful if you punctuated the sentences.
Feb
3
comment Meforshim Nick"names
This one always sticks out in my mind. I think the ר"ן routinely abbreviates רמב"ם this way and that I've noticed it in several editions.
Jan
28
comment 400 Years in Egypt (?)
It is also evident in the context of the original havtacha in B'reshis 15:13. Link: tora.us.fm/tnk1/jdl/MefarsheyTanach001-15.htm
Jan
28
comment 400 Years in Egypt (?)
He seems to do so in Sh'mos 6:20, in calculating the genealogical timeline of the Amram-Moshe-Aharon family. Link: tora.us.fm/tnk1/jdl/MefarsheyTanach002-06.htm
Jan
27
comment Tzar Balay Chaim- Killing Pests?
As Anonymous Chasid answered below, your question was "Are you allowed..." and since ליכא איסור כלל, the answer is "YES".
Jan
27
comment The Absolute Unity of G-d
א-להים (or אלהים for the profane meaning) is clearly grammatically plural, based on its agreement with plural adjectives and its declension for possessives. In all cases it follows the grammatical pattern of a plural. The Ibn Ezra I cited (as well as Rash"i, Ramba"n, Or Hachayim, et al.) understand it this way. The putative singular of the word would be א-לוה, which is attested plenty of times in תנ"ך. It is related to (but not equivalent to) א-ל.
Jan
27
comment Muktzeh Because its assur for me
@SimchasTorah No, I took the liberty of applying his rule regarding things that are אסור לאכילה ומותר להנאה to your cases.
Jan
27
comment Alarm clock handling on Shabbos
@SimchasTorah I have edited my answer to clarify that there is no prohibition of touching things due to shabas . There may be objects touching of which is prohibited (like the mizbe'ach for example) but not because of the day of the week.
Jan
26
comment Is being vegan “kosher”?
"a vegan diet might pose a problem of bugs" - I am not sure that I understand veganism correctly, but shouldn't it preclude eating bugs?
Jan
25
comment what are you allowed to lie about?
@avrohom Yes, I think that is what the רבנן hold in that גמרא. But far be it from me to pasken.
Jan
23
comment Can something be kashered by putting it in a cold pot then bringing it to a boil?
"one must be careful not to insert any dishes [to be kashered] until the water boils." Are you sure it's not "unless the water boils", which would not disqualify water that starts cold and subsequently boils?
Jan
23
comment Chabad Minhag for Shalosh Seudos
I once read a lengthy sicha justifying not eating anything physical and learning Torah instead to fulfill the third s'uda . Do you recall this?
Jan
21
comment Standing during the Aseres HaDibros
How near? (My experience with the universe is relatively limited, so I'm just curious.)
Jan
20
comment Saying korbonos
See this related answer to a different question: mi.yodeya.com/questions/1810/repeating-seder-hakitores/… In it, Shalom mentions that the purpose of saying this paragraph is to fill in for the karbanos we are failing to bring.
Jan
19
comment What is better - checking yourself - or buying pre checked?
"What is more L'Chatchila..." - Don't you mean "what is more preferable", since by definition, when in a position to ask this question, one is approaching it mil'chat'chila? (Using the word "preferable" would probably also increase the question's legibility.)
Jan
18
comment Tish'a Veshishim Umeya - mi yodeya?
Why is this mentioned in Sefer Y'tzira?
Jan
17
comment Rav Scheinberg and Tzitzis (series of questions)
ARTI, welcome to mi.yodeya and thank you for this informative answer! To reap all of the benefits that come with full mi.yodeya membership, consider clicking "Register" at the top of your page. We look forward to seeing you around in the future.
Jan
16
comment Daughters First
It would probably be easier to explain why the two whole clauses are parallel than to single out that implied pair. This is how Rash"i explains the פסוק, pointing out that it is impossible to ignore the parallel between the two clauses.
Jan
16
comment Daughters First
Please explain the question. The quote you brought makes no reference to women.