Hot answers tagged

5

I googled and found this exact application of these rules in the Business Halacha Institute's newsletter for Shoftim 5773. First, they indicate that the first principle you quote from 412:1, which they cite the Gemara in Bava Kama 27b for, does not apply here, since: The rationale is that people are not expected to be extra careful while they are in ...


5

Point number one, you are invading his privacy for which the cheirem of Rabbeinu Gershom would apparently apply. This article discusses similar modern inventions as far as this cheirem goes. http://www.torah.org/advanced/business-halacha/5757/vol2no17.html Second, while it seems the damage done by hacking is not 'real' in the sense that no property was ...


4

While hezek re'iyah is clearly an established halachic concept, they don't seem to explicate what's included in such a violation. In Bava Basra, they discuss what one may or may not do in building a house due to hezek re'iyah, and it seems that beis din may force a person to rebuild in order to fix any existing privacy violations. There's also a story in ...


2

It would seem from the Shulchan Aruch in Choshen Mishpat סימן שעח - אסור להזיק ממון חברו that one is responsible for all damage caused in the public domain, even unintentionally. א: אָסוּר לְהַזִּיק מָמוֹן חֲבֵרוֹ. וְאִם הִזִּיקוֹ, אַף עַל פִּי שֶׁאֵינוֹ נֶהֱנֶה, חַיָּב לְשַׁלֵּם נֶזֶק שָׁלֵם,‏ בֵּין שֶׁהָיָה שׁוֹגֵג בֵּין שֶׁהָיָה אָנוּס. ‏ ...


1

I didn't see anyone addressing this explicitly, but it seems to me from the subject matter there would be no monetary compensation for a damage to the fetus which does not result in the termination of the pregnancy. See Bava Kama 49a with Rashi. When the mishna said the value of the fetus, that encapsulated the monetary benefit (to the woman) of the fetus. ...



Only top voted, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible