Hot answers tagged ezra-nechemya
I think it means that they cried because they saw that the building was going to be smaller than the Temple that Shlomo HaMelech built, which is something that you can see from the size of the foundation. See Rashi, 3:12 sv זה הבית: כשהיו רואין בניין בית זה היו בוכין מתוך שהיו זוכרים אותו בניין גדול של בית ראשון When they saw the construction of ...
They would take out a separate Sefer Torah and read the curses, in addition to the standard weekly parshah. Source: I heard it directly from a well-known rav, who based it on the Rambam Hil. Tefillah, 13:1-2.
The first day of the seventh month is the holiday Rosh Hashanah. It is known as the day when the world was created, and is also the Day of Judgement. It is still a festive holiday, with many unique customs. You can learn more about it on Wikipedia, or by browsing Mi Yodeya's 90+ Rosh Hashanah questions.
Exodus Rabah 51:3, (third paragraph in your link) מהו משכן שני פעמים א"ר שמואל בר מרתא שנתמשכן שני פעמים על ידיהם זהו שאנשי כנסת הגדולה אומרים (נחמיה א) חבול חבלנו לך ולא שמרנו את המצות ואת החוקים ואת המשפטים מהו חבול חבלנו לך הוי שנתמשכן ב' פעמים ואין חבול אלא משכון שנאמר (דברים כד) לא יחבול רחים ורכב לכך כתיב אלה פקודי המשכן משכן העדות ב' ...
In the comments, you cite this link. I believe you were confused due to English not being your first language by this sentence: "used as a proper name of God only." In context, that sentence does not mean that the word אֲדֹנָי can only refer to God. It means that the word אֲדֹנָי refers to God when it is used as a proper name. Indeed, as Yishai pointed out ...
Judaica Press commentary on 8:14 says And the found written ... It seems very strange that the Jews did not know anything about the mitzvah of sukkah ... The commentary states that it was not that they did not know about the mitzvah of sukkos. Judaica Press cites Malbim and others that this refers to Yerushalayim as specified in Shulchan Aruch ...
I once heard this question asked at an Arachim function. The answer given was that although Koresh had the utensils returned, not all of them made it back and therefore Achashveirosh used the ones that he still had. I have not seen a written source for this though.
Ezra was comparable to Moshe, and would have given the Torah had Moshe not preceded him, so it is not unreasonable to say that his actions were legitimate. Anyway, it is also seen from a posuk in Yehoshua, in Yevomos 89b.
The Yalkut Shimoni mentions that he is Hamans son in עמוס 545. The Maharsha (Megilla 16a) quotes this in the name of the Targum. The Hagaas Vehaaros there from Oz Vehadar write that although it is implied there (9:14) it does not seem to be written there explicitly.
Only top voted, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible