If one has surgery (may it never be necessary) that requires the removal of an organ of the body (e.g. a gallbladder or appendix), is burial required? Or can the body part simply be discarded?
Tell me more
×
Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for
those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
See Yoreh Deah 362 Pischei Teshuva #1 were it seems amputated organs need not be buried, but consult your LOR (local orthodox Rabbi). Also see Kesuvos 20b where the custom is to bury amputated organs. |
|||||
|
|
A family member was in an accident and there were unidentifiable pieces of flesh and skin preserved in formaldehyde which a rav told us must be buried. so the chevra kadisha did it for us. i dont know about internal organs but I've never heard of burying that. |
||||
|
|
|
The majority opinion follows Rabbi Yechezkel ben Yehuda Landau (1713 – 1793) opinion at Noda B’Yehuda I, Yoreh Deah (YD) 90, who holds that the mitzvah to bury separated body parts is required only of people who are dead, because it would be a disgrace not to. Rav Moshe Feinstein (1895-1986), however, held that even the body parts of living people must be buried because a kohen could become tamei from contact with those parts. Igros Moshe, YD I, 231, citing Nazir 43b. See also, Rambam (Rabbi Moshe ben Maimon, aka Maimonedes (1135-1204)), Tumas Mes 2:3. In Berachos 5b and Baba Basra 116a, Rabbi Yochanan is quoted as saying that he was carrying with him a "bone" of his deceased 10th son. Rashi believes the bone was small enough that it would not convey tumah. The Rashbam (at Baba Basra 116a) argues that Rabbi Yochanan must have been carrying his son's tooth, since that definitely would not convey tumah and does not require burial. But that position is in dispute. Although it is well held that a person may benefit from the tooth of a living person, others question whether one is permitted benefit from the tooth of a deceased person. See, e.g., Ran (Rav Nissim of Gerona, 1320-1376), Chulin 122a; Rabbi Ovadia Yosef (b. 1920), Shlita, Yabia Omer, III, YD 21. |
|||
|
|
|
I heard a lecture from Rabbi Elchanan Zohn, head of the Chevra Kadisha of Queens, about this. Something like a small tumor, or tonsils, would certainly not need burial. A limb -- flesh, bone, and sinew -- such as a finger would require burial. For internal organs, the opinion heard orally from Rabbi Moshe Feinstein -- and repeatedly from his son Rabbi Dovid Feinstein shlit'a -- is that any organ that holds something requires burial -- even a gallbladder. The prevalent practice of many, many poskim, however, is that they don't. |
|||||||||
|
|
I don't know if this is the same thing, but here is a letter the Lubavitcher Rebbe wrote in 1965 to the Association of Orthodox Doctors. In the letter, the Rebbe encourages religious doctors to incorporate Halacha into their medical practices. One of the issues the Rebbe discusses is autopsies. Here is what he writes:
|
|||||||
|
|
It says by Yiftach that he was buried in the cities of Gilad. The gemarah explains that he contracted a disease which made him lose limbs over time which were then buried in different cities in which he lost them. |
|||||||
|
|
I remember learning that if the organ includes a bone it must be buried, but if it's just soft tissue it can be discarded. (This only applies before death - after death even a blood soaked tissue must be buried.) |
|||
|
|
