Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

If I consider the Bris Milah unconscionable in the context of my own (someday) son, what are the alternatives?

share|improve this question

closed as not constructive by Isaac Moses Sep 2 '11 at 12:37

As it currently stands, this question is not a good fit for our Q&A format. We expect answers to be supported by facts, references, or expertise, but this question will likely solicit debate, arguments, polling, or extended discussion. If you feel that this question can be improved and possibly reopened, visit the help center for guidance.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

Education? Then you'd realize that "unconscionable" is not based on good reasoning. – AviD Sep 2 '11 at 12:17
This question, at least in its present form, appears confrontational and asking for debate rather than an answer. – Isaac Moses Sep 2 '11 at 12:38
@AviD. You're assuming facts not in evidence, such as that Collin's objection is on medical grounds. It may be that Collin does not want to override his child's consent and right to self-determination. – TRiG Jul 14 '12 at 21:24
@TRiG you... are absolutely correct. I did make that assumption, not realizing I was assuming it. Reasonable assumption, but still, you are correct. – AviD Jul 19 '12 at 12:43
@AviD. I'd say that performing any form of elective surgery or body modifications on an infant is just morally wrong. I'm also very uncomfortable with inducting babies into a religion (I'm not a fan of infant baptism, for example). Circumcision combines two ethically dodgy practices in one easy bundle. I'm not impressed. – TRiG Jul 19 '12 at 17:43

From here:

from Soloveichik’s “How Not to Become a Jew” in the January issue of Commentary [online for subscribers of the print version only.] He cites Franz Rosenzweig, who is perhaps the most significant Jewish thinker of the twentieth century to Jews outside of the Orthodox pale.

There is only one community in which such a linked sequence of everlasting life unity without hearing deep within a voice that adds: “are eternal.” It must be a blood community, because only blood gives warrant to the hope for a future.

In other words, part of the notion of requiring bris (circumcision or some form of blood-letting) as an integral part of the conversion process is to emphasize that the convert becomes part of a blood relationship. He enters an extended family, not just a faith. He becomes connected to, and assumes responsibility for, all other Jews in horizontal and vertical temporal planes.

share|improve this answer
Which is, of course, why only boys are circumcised. – TRiG Jul 14 '12 at 21:25
@Trig -- huh? I don't get it. – Shalom Jul 16 '12 at 6:02
Assume that I'm (a) a feminist, (b) non-religious, and (c) sometimes quite sarcastic. You might then get it. – TRiG Jul 17 '12 at 13:22

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.