Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

What can be considered a veil to be used in a bedeken at a wedding?

(See also my other related question)

share|improve this question
Paul, I've edited your question so that it doesn't appear to be a request for personal Halachic guidance, which this site can't provide, but your Rabbi can. In addition, I deleted your second question, since that should be asked as a separate question. You can retrieve the text from the revision history. – Isaac Moses Aug 16 '11 at 21:53
Noted. Thanks! I will create and link the second question. – Paul Aug 16 '11 at 21:56
Thanks for your understanding. Also, Mazal Tov! 8^) – Isaac Moses Aug 16 '11 at 21:57

Nit'ei Gavri'el on the topic quotes the Shulchan Aruch to say that the veil should be opaque from the outside and should not be ornamented with gold and silver thread. The reason for opacity seems to be to demonstrate that the marriage is unconditional on factors such as money because if the bride cannot see what the groom is holding as he approaches her she cannot possibly be making her decision to marry him on the basis of its value. The rather extensive footnotes point to but do not explicate the reasoning for the limitation on gold and silver thread.

In more extensive footnotes he also cites practices of several sources to make the veil out of a special preexisting object - cloth used to cover a shofar, material used in performance of some other mitzva or even a previously-owned piece of fabric that had belonged to a tzadik.

share|improve this answer

Anything that covers the face is fine. There are those that use thick material which is not see through, and there are those that use material that is very sheer.

share|improve this answer
A source for your first sentence would be nice. – msh210 Aug 17 '11 at 4:32
Can you be more specific about "face"? Does that require lower than the eyes? Lower than the chin? Lower than the neck? – Paul Aug 17 '11 at 23:52

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.