Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

A Kindle is an e-book reader that uses "e-ink" rather than an LCD screen. It has physical controls to turn pages. If left unused it enters a sleep mode, and you can return to reading by moving a button. Returning from sleep mode causes a light (LED? not sure what it is, but not heat-emitting) to flash.

If the device is already turned on at the start of Shabbat and the reading material itself is not objectionable (that is, there'd be no problem if you were reading the exact same book on paper), is its use permitted or forbidden on Shabbat? Please bring sources/arguments either way.

This question is not about using the Kindle's web browser to access the Internet; that's a different question. And while it overlaps the question of texting on Shabbat, it seems to me that consuming text is not the same as creating it. (If I'm wrong about that, please enlighten me.)

share|improve this question
    
Excellent question, but, believe it or not, not our first about this technology. See also judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/7275/… –  Isaac Moses Jul 20 '11 at 14:40
    
There is also a touch-screen version of the Nook (B&N's e-reader to compete with the Kindle). I guess that might require an entirely different analysis. –  Seth J Jul 20 '11 at 20:52
    
@SethJ: as you say, the Nook uses different technology and I don't know which aspects of the technology make a difference. Is it any electrical device or only ones that operate in certain ways? I'm asking about the one that seems farthest away from a standard computer display. –  Monica Cellio Jul 20 '11 at 23:28
    
@SethJ The Nook touchscreen, isn't e-ink paper. They haven't quite gotten that technology working yet. –  avi Jul 21 '11 at 9:40
1  
@Monica See my answer below as a food-for-thought (not as a full answer) piece. E-ink has its own problems even if it doesn't fit the "traditional" model of a computer screen. It may be less like fire but more like real writing. If you're not the one generating the writing (as opposed to, say, texting), might it be ok? I don't know. It's not so simple, but there's a lot of interest at the moment in figuring it out. –  Seth J Jul 21 '11 at 13:51
show 6 more comments

6 Answers 6

up vote 7 down vote accepted

No, it is not permitted to use a Kindle or any other electronic e-reader on Shabbat or Yom Tov (Chol Ha'Moed may be a different story).


There are two primary halachic issues with using such a device on Shabbat or Yom Tov:

  1. The usage of electricity
  2. The creation of letters

The Usage of Electricity

There is a debate amongst contemporary poskim as to what the prohibition of using electricity is on Shabbat and Yom Tov. Rav Avrohom Yeshaya Karelitz (commonly known as the Chazon Ish) was of the opinion that all applications of electricity would fall into the category of Boneh, the melacha of building and that these applications would be deorita or Torah prohibitions. Rav Chaim Ozer Grodzinski, in his SHu'T Achiezer is of the opinion that electricity falls into the category of ma'avir, the melacha of kindling, and that the Torah prohibition only applies in a situation where heat is generated (ie. a light-bulb) but in other situations it would fall into the category of a Rabbinic prohibition (which may be taken lightly!). Still, other poskim (I believe, Rav Shlomo Zalman Aurbach)are of the opinion that applications of electricity fall into the category of molid or creating something new, which is a Rabbinic prohibition (again, see note above). Rav Moshe Feinstein, in his Igrot Moshe seems to be of the opinion that applications of electricity would not constitute a Torah prohibition, however he cautions not to take this issue lightly as there is a 'chance that it involves the Torah prohibition of maakah b'patish (the final hammer blow)'.

Additional Info: Just found this Wikipedia page which, although I just skimmed it, appears to do a very good job presenting the issue: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electricity_on_Shabbat_in_Jewish_law

Either way, whether applications of electricity are a Torah prohibition or a Rabbinic one, usage of a Kindle or other e-reader would be prohibited on the grounds that thousands of circuits are created and destroyed constantly as one uses the device.

The Creation of Letters

The prohibition of kotev, the melecha of writing, extends far beyond simply writing letters, the prohibition extends to forming any meaningful images which convey a message (amongst other things). The Mishna Berurah discusses a case in which an individual take a letter made of silver and places it on a background (thus making the letter clear) and rules that this is prohibited as kotev, certainly in the case of a Kindle or other e-reader, where the letters are formed (as opposed to being ready made) and the device is designed to use a contrasting background to make them clear this would fall into the category of kotev.

There will be those who argue that the prohibition of kotev only applies to something which is lasting (there is a debate as to the time-frame required for lasting, but most agree that it is 25 hours), but this argument is flawed. Firstly, this only reduces the prohibition to a rabbinic one (again, see note above). Secondly, I don't think the rule of lasting writing can be applied to this case based on the Rambam in his Mishne Torah where he discussed a case where a person writes on his skin with ink, even though the ink will certainly be erased by the person's sweat, it is nevertheless prohibited based on the fact that at the time of writing it was a permanent act. Based on the fact that the Kindle boasts a one month battery life, I would view each act of 'writing' as lasting for the purposes of hilchot shabbat.

All in all, it is clear, for various reasons, that using any electronic device on Shabbat or Yom Tov is prohibited on either a Torah or rabbinic level and therefore forbidden (except in certain extenuating circumstances which are outside the scope of this post) and certainly adding the element of creating letters to the issue further compounds the prohibition and therefore using a Kindle or other e-reader device would be prohibited.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Using a Kindle is definitely permitted, as the Kindle did not even exist when the ancient texts were written, so they can't forbid it.

share|improve this answer
1  
Neither did incandescent light bulbs, and yet it's forbidden to turn them on. –  Monica Cellio Jul 21 at 18:10
2  
Neither did guns, yet it's forbidden to shoot people with them. –  msh210 Jul 21 at 19:29
1  
Neither did strike-on-box matches, but it is prohibited to strike them. (We could make a long list here.) –  YEZ Jul 21 at 21:00
1  
Not through hearsay. Through tradition. –  Double AA 2 days ago
1  
@Cosmin - may I suggest Judaism-101? As in programming, in Judiasm you can't guess answers; there are rules and methods that need to be studied and followed. –  Danny Schoemann 2 days ago
show 3 more comments

This opinion seems relevant (Discussed on page 34 and on): http://www.rabbinicalassembly.org/sites/default/files/public/halakhah/teshuvot/2011-2020/electrical-electronic-devices-shabbat.pdf

share|improve this answer
3  
It could be. Perhaps you could edit into your answer which part exactly. –  Double AA Oct 11 '12 at 1:44
add comment

Aside from the electricity needed to change pages, I think the melacha that e-ink runs into is Tzovei'a (dyeing). You are not allowed to paint things, and color things, and dye things on Shabbat.

The Kindle uses an Electrophoretic display, where basically, reflective titanium particles are suspended in a dark fluid. They are electrically charged to move to the from the front sheet of the display where they would appear white, to the back of sheet of the display, letting us see the dark ink. Pressing a button sends an electric signal to change their charges.

That being said, there is a possibility that it is not dyeing. On transition eye-glass lenses, Chacham Ovadia said that they are permissible since it is not a normal way to dye.

share|improve this answer
4  
Are there other examples of Dying applying to moving particles around, as opposed to changing the color of a material or binding a liquid dye to it? For example, do we know if covering an object with talcum powder would be considered Dying? –  Isaac Moses Jul 20 '11 at 18:58
add comment

E-ink is not any more like physical ink than a CRT or LCD monitor. They both have the same issues, as they are both virtual and made of pixels. But one angle that I saw considered in a blog post by Rabbi Elli Fischer on the subject of texting stated that the ubiquity of virtual writing might make it more akin to physical writing than one would have considered it to be several years ago, since its existence is a new type of "permanence". It's located on electronic media, perhaps even a cloud, but that doesn't mean it disappears just because it's not on the screen, and the fact that it's digitized (1s and 0s) doesn't (anymore) mean it isn't writing. In other words, writing as we know it is so fundamentally different than it used to be that, perhaps, the definition of writing needs to be changed in order for the word and the concept of writing to retain any meaning at all. R' Fischer seems to believe that e-books might one day be given a Heter, although I find it hard to believe that would ever happen, at least without some very heavy rabbinic gymnastics.

share|improve this answer
    
"E-ink is not any more like physical ink than a CRT or LCD monitor" In once case, actual particles are being manipulated to form letters, while on LCD, there's just shining light. –  Ariel K Jul 20 '11 at 23:50
1  
@Seth J Your undersatnding of E-Ink technology is severely lacking. I suggest you read up on the subject. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_paper electronics.howstuffworks.com/gadgets/high-tech-gadgets/… –  avi Jul 21 '11 at 9:49
    
Ariel K and @Avi I admit a limited knowledge of the technology's complexities, although I do assert that I'm not entirely ignorant on the subject generally. They both use pixels to form the shapes of letters. That (and storage) is what I was addressing as a matter of whether or not it constitutes Halachic writing, not as a matter of igniting or extinguishing fires or generating heat, etc. It's an open question whether or not HaZa"L would have considered this writing in defining the parameters of Melachah vis a vis Shabbath. I don't have the requisite PhD or Semichah to decide this. –  Seth J Jul 21 '11 at 13:48
    
@Seth J I'm not sure what you mean by "both using pixels"... Using ink and paper you can also draw pixels. (Like the image of a newspaper, or the output of a Dot Matrix printer...) –  avi Jul 21 '11 at 16:25
    
@avi "Using ink and paper you can also draw pixels. (Like the image of a newspaper, or the output of a Dot Matrix printer...)" ...both of which are prohibited on Shabbath. –  Seth J Jul 21 '11 at 16:33
show 2 more comments

If anything it would be worse.

Many Rabbis say that there is no prohibition of erasing on a CRT screen because nothing is written, just a series of lights turning on and off fast creating the impression that something is written. I don't know the exact technology behind the kindle, but if there is real ink (like an etch-a-sketch), then every time one turns the page one could violate the Rabbinic prohibition of erasing/writing.

However, even the "physical" controls use electricity to control the screen, and the same prohibition of electricity on a classic computer would apply here too.

share|improve this answer
    
So if e-ink is ink then it's writing/erasing, and if it's not ink then it's kindling fire (the light)? –  Monica Cellio Jul 20 '11 at 16:46
1  
it could be kindling either way (it depends on the different opinions as to why electricity is forbidden) but not for the display itself(for lighting something up to be kindling it has to light up due to heat like an incandescent light). –  Shmuel Brin Jul 20 '11 at 17:27
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.