Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

A number of reasons are given for sending away the mother bird before taking her eggs/young. The Rambam says it is for the mercy on the mother bird. The Ramban says it is to perfect our own mercy.

Contemporary halachos seem to ignore the spirit of this mitzva. From Star-K:

Once the mother bird has flown away, one must take the eggs or chicks. Even if the mother bird is watching, one still fulfills the mitzvah. To perform a halachic acquisition, they should be lifted to a height of three tefachim (about 12 inches). Upon completion of the mitzvah, one may put back the eggs or chicks and need not keep them.

After one takes the eggs or chicks, they may be declared hefker by the one who acquired them and then returned to the nest. After the mother bird returns, another person may fulfill the mitzvah. In this way, the same nest may be used over and over again.

The structure of sending the mother bird away without needing the eggs (and returning it to send the mother away again) seems antithetical to both reasons stated above. A footnote to the latter paragraph drives this contradiction home:

If the eggs cool down too many times, they may no longer be viable (University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture). The mitzvah is not fulfilled on non-viable eggs.

Does the halacha go by a different reasoning? Do we ignore any reasons when performing the mitzva (as in Brachos 5:3)? Is the Star-K promoting structure over spirit?

share|improve this question
Related: judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/1120/… – WAF Jun 15 '11 at 2:29
@WAF, thanks, I didn't notice that. – YDK Jun 15 '11 at 5:52
@Yirmiyahu quotes a Pischei Teshuva/Chavos Yair that brings a machlokes in this and paskens that you don't need to take the eggs/young. This is backed by the Aruch haShulchan who goes through a similar back and forth, paskening that it's a gezeiras hamelech. This other approach is alluded to in the Moreh where the Rambam brings the Mishna in brachos and concludes that we don't pasken like that shittah. – YDK Jun 15 '11 at 16:13

Common, common misunderstanding.

It's not:

Don't make the mother bird feel bad to see her eggs taken away.

It is, instead:

Maternal instinct prevents the mother from fleeing when a predator approaches the eggs. Don't take advantage of that maternal instinct and take the mother too.

(Heard from my father in the name of R' Yaakov Weinberg zt'l; observing the Rambam adds the line "and the mother can't run away")

share|improve this answer
The Rambam seems to say that the best case scenario is that you won't take the eggs/young at all, but if you do, at least the mother shouldn't be affected by the sight: hebrewbooks.org/pdfpager.aspx?req=9463&st=&pgnum=120 – YDK Jun 15 '11 at 16:08

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.