Those that refrain from allowing a younger sibling to get married prior to an older sibling mention the verse from Lavan, "Lo Yaiose Kain BimiKomeinu Losais Hatziyira Lifnei HaBechira, In our locale we do not marry off the younger child prior to the older one". Are there any other sources for this Minhag? Is there an age that you say "at this point we stop waiting"? (sources please)
|
|
One of the first responsa in Igros Moshe Even HaEzer says if you're ready to get married, then go get married; don't wait for an older sibling (even if s/he complains). If two siblings get engaged at approximately the same time, then we'd say the older one's wedding should happen first. But that's all the waiting we do. |
|||||
|
|
Here is a series of excerpts from the Lubavitcher Rebbe's letters regarding this. A summary of the points:
|
|||||||||
|
|
It's mentioned in Tosafos, Kiddushin 52a. There is a detailed analysis of the topic, by R' Wasserman of Los Angeles, here: http://www.shtaygen.co.il/?CategoryID=1565&ArticleID=6008 |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
From Rabbi Chaim Kaner Family First magazine 24,4,13 The earliest source for not skipping an older child stems from a comment of the rashbam in BB 120a. Tlofchod had five daughters and married according to age. Like Lavan said the older comes first. Rav Graubart, in 'chavalim banimim' that yaakov didnt agree with lavan. The Maharsham 3:136 says its a matter of courtesy not halacha. Therefore since a boy has mitsva to marry and not a girl he may go ahead. Also if the older sibling is 27 or more the younger need not wait. The sefer Shulchan hoezer is stringent in these matters. Since he is shaming his older sibling even a boy cannot marry before a girls. Shaming a person takes precedence over the mitsva. RMF says one doesnt have to wait only for the wedding not the engagement. RMF does not consider it to be shaming. This is in short the article. |
|||
|