Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I heard a quote once how carefully a person needs to analyze every drop of ink in Rashi, but I don't remember who said it. Does any Rishon (medieval scholar) ever discuss their approach to Rashi's perush on Gemara? Do they ever make diyyukim, or do very close readings of rashi?

share|improve this question

There are many supercommentaries on Rashi's commentary to Chumash, which do pay very close attention to each word he wrote, but these are written by Acharonim for the most part.

Rashi's commentary was popular already throughout the times of the Rishonim. Here are several famous quotes from Rishonim about Rashi that I know of:

Ramban: (Inro. to commentary on Torah)

ואשים למאור פני נרות המנורה הטהורה, פירושי רבינו שלמה עטרת צבי וצפירת תפארה, מוכתר בנמוסו במקרא במשנה ובגמרא, לו משפט הבכורה, בדבריו אהגה, באהבתם אשגה, ועמהם יהיה לנו משא ומתן דרישה וחקירה, בפשטיו ובמדרשיו וכל אגדה בצורה, אשר בפירושיו זכורה

Rashbam: (Bereshis 37:2)

רבינו שלמה אבי אמי מאיר עיני גולה שפירש תורה נביאים וכתובים נתן לב לפרש פשוטו של מקרא, ואף אני שמואל ב"ר מאיר חתנו זצ"ל נתווכחתי עמו ולפניו והודה לי שאילו היה לו פנאי היה צריך לעשות פרושים אחרים לפי הפשטות המתחדשים בכל יום

Abarbanel: (Intro. to Yehoshua)

כי רע ומר לי המעשה שהרב הגדול רש"י ז"ל נסתפק בפירושיו לספרי הקדש ברוב הענינים עם מה שדרשו חז"ל

share|improve this answer
Re: the Rashbam's quote, Rashi has quite a bit in the perush on Chumash that many would not consider "peshuto shel mikra;" i.e. midrash. – yitznewton Oct 19 '11 at 14:50
@yitznewton, indeed. See judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/6103/is-rashi-really-pshat – jake Oct 19 '11 at 19:09
Great list of quotes. Also see what the Meiri gas to say towards the end of his Hakdamah to Avos. – Ish Ploni ViKohen Feb 6 '14 at 17:56

(The title implies you are speaking about Rash"i's commentary on the g'mara, which was not composed the same way as his commentary on chumash but the question does not make a distinction.)

There are many supercommentaries on the commentary on the Torah, many of whom make statements like that. A great book that analyzes it all is this one: Patterns in Rashi. If you are looking for close readings and diyukim, that is the book for you.

share|improve this answer
I clarified the question, thanks. – Ariel K May 15 '11 at 2:56

There is a rishon who explicitly says how to analyze Rashi. It is Rabbi Yitzhak Kanpanton from Spain. He was the rabbi of the Abuhav who was the rabbi of the Bet Yosef. He wrote a clear approach of how to learn gemara.

This book can save the world. Nothing like it in the last 500 years. The Chason Ish held highly of the book, as did the Shelah. It is Darchei Hatalmud or Darchei Hagemera.

share|improve this answer
avihu aboud, welcome to Judaism.SE, and thanks very much for this information! I deleted the last part of your answer, which was not directly relevant to the question at hand. Any information about yourself that you'd like to share should go in your profile. Also, please consider registering your account, to ensure that the same profile is connected to all of your contributions. – Isaac Moses Oct 19 '11 at 14:18
wasnt Mahari Abuhav the rebbi of Mahari Beirav who was in turn the rebbi of the Beis Yosef? – mevaqesh Jun 11 '15 at 17:40

There are two rishonim who specifically praised Rashi's work on Gemara (as opposed to Chumash):

R. Yitzchak Canpanton: (Darchei HaTalmud, 12)

Rashi z"l had the custom and method not to speak a thing or emit a word in his language if it were not necessary, I mean to say that when he speaks something about the language of the Gemara or explains something it is because it is [otherwise] opaque [as in, unclear], or to save one from an alternative explanation which is incorrect, or [to save one] from a question, difficulty, or problem, or to fix the language.

He similarly writes regarding questions of Tosafos: (siman 1)

With every word of Tosfos and their innovations in halakha, after you know his intent or doubt or question, you should return to inspect the words of Rashi z"l and see if he felt this [i.e. was aware of this problem] and guarded himself from it

The Meiri also has a poetic description of how Rashi must be studied with great care:

Though numerous are those who fight with him, his weapon is in his hand, and his responses that are discernable whithn his explanations are correct to those who understand them; his greatness is recognizable to only a few, for with one word he will sometimes include answers to bundles of questions

share|improve this answer

In order to help analyze Rashi you must also know his "buzzwords". In the back of every edition of Masechet Brachos is the Mevo Hatalmud. In the back of the Mevo Hatalmud is a small section called כּללים רשׁי "Klalim Rashi" where many terms are explained.

share|improve this answer
The question asked specifically for rishonim's views. Was M'vo Hatalmud written by a rishon? – msh210 Oct 24 '11 at 7:06
It looks like it was written by the kitzur mevo hatalmud which was written by the son of the Mesores Hashas. Not sure if he is a Rishon or early Ahcron. Even so looks like he is a heavy hitter.The Radbaz usually says some of the same points. – avihu aboud Oct 24 '11 at 19:23
Did you just say the Mevo Hatalmud was written by the Kitzur Mevo Hatalmud?? – Double AA Jul 17 '12 at 18:31

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.