Take the 2-minute tour ×
Mi Yodeya is a question and answer site for those who base their lives on Jewish law and tradition and anyone interested in learning more. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The Gemara in Pesachim (ה:‏) says if you are holding Chometz for a gentile and Pesach comes you have to burn it. How is it possible to say that: it is Gezel Akum and even if you pay him back you are still stealing the actual item?

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

True, but at this point the item deposited with you is going to cause you harm (because you'll be violating the mitzvos of בל יראה ובל ימצא). So, logically, you should be allowed to get rid of it.

A possibly analogous case is in Shulchan Aruch, Choshen Mishpat 292:8, where a person who is holding money or valuables for someone else is threatened by thieves, and he gives them the deposit in order to save himself. The rule there is that if he's not particularly wealthy (אינו אמוד), then we assume that the thieves were attracted by the rumor that he's got something valuable in his house, and then he is indeed exempt from having to repay the owner - because the deposit itself is what caused all the trouble in the first place. (Here, in the case of the chametz, he is indeed liable to the gentile to replace it - otherwise it would be של אחרים and he wouldn't have to get rid of it anyway - but that's because the Jew accepted this responsibility along with the chametz, and it is also the law of the land that he is so responsible - see Shulchan Aruch Harav 440:9.)

share|improve this answer
    
I think CHometz and threat to life are different? –  SimchasTorah Apr 10 '11 at 5:54
    
In the case in Choshen Mishpat, the person holding the deposit is saving his property, not necessarily his life, by handing over the item. –  Alex Apr 11 '11 at 3:12

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.